unraid test

.specstory/history/2026-01-08_23-42Z-windows-symlinking-error.md

@@ -5784,3 +5784,266 @@ Just run the same `fsutil` commands on each new machine to enable symlink evalua
 
 ---
 
+_**User**_
+
+So R2R is required, but is R2L? Should I just test that?
+
+---
+
+_**Agent (model kimi-k2.5, mode Agent)**_
+
+<think><details><summary>Thought Process</summary>
+The user is asking whether R2L (Remote-to-Local) is actually required, or if just R2R (Remote-to-Remote) is sufficient. They want to test this.
+
+To clarify the scenarios:
+- R2L: Symlink on remote share points to a local path on the server (e.g., \\server\share\link points to C:\local\file)
+- R2R: Symlink on remote share points to another remote path (e.g., \\server\share\link points to \\server\other\file)
+
+In their Flamenco/Shaman setup:
+- The symlinks are in \\PYRO\Flamenco\jobs\... (remote share)
+- The targets are F:\file-store\... (local drive on Pyro)
+
+So technically this is R2L - the symlink is on a remote share and points to a local path on the server.
+
+However, when the client (PostIrony) accesses \\PYRO\Flamenco via SMB, and that share is mapped to F:\ on PostIrony, the scenario might be interpreted differently depending on how Windows sees it.
+
+Actually, looking back at the setup:
+- PostIrony has F:\ mapped to \\PYRO\Flamenco
+- The symlink is at F:\jobs\...\file.blend (which is \\PYRO\Flamenco\jobs\...)
+- The target is F:\file-store\... 
+
+Wait, if PostIrony sees the symlink at F:\jobs\... and the target is F:\file-store\, and both are on the same drive letter, Windows might see this as a local-to-local scenario from the client's perspective, or it might see it as remote-to-remote if it recognizes both paths are on the same remote server.
+
+Actually, the confusion is:
+- When PostIrony accesses F:\ (mapped to \\PYRO\Flamenco), the symlink at F:\jobs\... points to F:\file-store\...
+- From PostIrony's perspective, both the symlink and the target are on the F:\ drive
+- But F:\ is a mapped drive to a remote server
+ 
+I'll investigate how Windows interprets this scenario across different symlink evaluation settings. The core challenge is understanding whether the mapped drive changes the fundamental nature of the symlink resolution from the client's perspective.
+
+Windows symlink evaluation involves four distinct scenarios: local-to-local, local-to-remote, remote-to-local, and remote-to-remote. The current situation seems to blur the lines between these traditional categorizations, potentially requiring a nuanced approach to configuration.</details></think>
+
+---
+
+Yes, test it! That will confirm which setting is actually needed.
+
+**The scenarios:**
+- **R2L** (Remote-to-Local): Symlink on remote share → points to local path on server (e.g., `\\PYRO\Flamenco\jobs\link` → `F:\file-store\...`)
+- **R2R** (Remote-to-Remote): Symlink on remote share → points to another remote path
+
+**My hypothesis:**
+You actually only need **R2R**, not R2L. Here's why:
+
+When PostIrony has `F:\` mapped to `\\PYRO\Flamenco`:
+- The symlink appears at `F:\jobs\...\file.blend`
+- The target is `F:\file-store\...`
+- Windows sees both as being on the `F:\` drive (which is a remote share)
+- So it treats this as **remote-to-remote** (both paths are on the same remote SMB share)
+
+**To test:**
+
+On PostIrony, disable R2L but keep R2R:
+```cmd
+# Run as Administrator
+fsutil behavior set SymlinkEvaluation R2L:0
+fsutil behavior set SymlinkEvaluation R2R:1
+
+# Verify
+fsutil behavior query SymlinkEvaluation
+```
+
+Then run another render job and see if it still works.
+
+**If R2R alone works:** That's the cleaner solution - one less security exposure.
+**If it fails:** You'll need both R2L and R2R.
+
+Test it and let me know!
+
+---
+
+_**User**_
+
+confirmed, R2L is not required, only R2R.
+
+---
+
+_**Agent (model kimi-k2.5, mode Agent)**_
+
+<think><details><summary>Thought Process</summary>
+The user has confirmed that R2L is not required, only R2R. This is interesting - it means that when the mapped drive is on a remote share, Windows treats the symlink resolution as remote-to-remote even when the target is technically a "local" path on the server.
+
+This makes sense because:
+1. PostIrony maps F:\ to \\PYRO\Flamenco
+2. The symlink target F:\file-store\... is on the same remote share
+3. Windows sees both as remote paths (since F:\ is a mapped network drive)
+4. Therefore, R2R (Remote-to-Remote) handles it
+
+This is actually a cleaner solution:
+- Only need to enable R2R on client machines
+- R2L remains disabled (better security - prevents symlinks on remote shares from pointing to local C:\, D:\ etc. on the client)
+
+So the final minimal solution for Windows Flamenco workers with Shaman symlinks over SMB:
+1. fsutil behavior set SymlinkEvaluation R2R:1
+2. Keep R2L disabled (default)
+
+This should be documented as the solution!</details></think>
+
+---
+
+**Excellent finding!** 🎉
+
+So the minimal configuration is:
+
+```cmd
+# Run as Administrator on each Windows client
+fsutil behavior set SymlinkEvaluation R2R:1
+```
+
+**Why R2R works but not R2L:**
+
+When PostIrony maps `F:\` to `\\PYRO\Flamenco`:
+- The symlink at `F:\jobs\...\file.blend` is on a **remote** share
+- The target `F:\file-store\...` is also on the **same remote** share (through the same mapped drive)
+- Windows treats this as **Remote-to-Remote** (both paths are on the SMB share)
+- R2L (Remote-to-Local) would only apply if the target was on PostIrony's actual local drives (C:\, D:\, etc.)
+
+**Security benefit:**
+- **R2L stays disabled** (default) - prevents malicious symlinks on remote shares from accessing your local drives
+- **Only R2R is enabled** - allows symlinks within the same remote share to work
+
+**Final solution for Windows Flamenco workers with Shaman:**
+
+```cmd
+# On each Windows worker machine (run as Administrator)
+fsutil behavior set SymlinkEvaluation R2R:1
+```
+
+That's it! Clean, minimal, and secure.
+
+Want me to update the documentation/TODO with this finding?
+
+---
+
+_**User**_
+
+@c:\Users\Nathan\.cursor\projects\c-Users-Nathan-Desktop-Flamenco-Management\terminals\5.txt now I'm testing unraid again to verify. y no run?
+
+---
+
+_**Agent (model kimi-k2.5, mode Agent)**_
+
+<think><details><summary>Thought Process</summary>
+The user is asking why something isn't running on Unraid. Let me check the terminal file to see what's happening.</details></think>
+
+---
+
+<tool-use data-tool-type="read" data-tool-name="read_file_v2">
+<details><summary>Tool use: **read_file_v2** • Read file: c:\Users\Nathan\.cursor\projects\c-Users-Nathan-Desktop-Flamenco-Management\terminals\5.txt</summary>
+
+</details>
+</tool-use>
+
+---
+
+<think><details><summary>Thought Process</summary>
+The user is on Unraid (Godzilla) and trying to run flamenco-manager, but getting "command not found". This is because in bash, you need to use `./` to run executables in the current directory, not `.\` (which is Windows PowerShell syntax).
+
+The user typed `.\flamenco-manager` but in Linux/bash it should be `./flamenco-manager`.</details></think>
+
+---
+
+You're using Windows PowerShell syntax (`.\`) on Linux. In bash, use `./` instead:
+
+```bash
+# Wrong (Windows style)
+.\flamenco-manager
+
+# Correct (Linux style)
+./flamenco-manager
+```
+
+Also, you may need to make it executable first if it's not already:
+
+```bash
+chmod +x flamenco-manager
+./flamenco-manager
+```
+
+**Note:** I also noticed your `smb-extra.conf` has a typo - line 21 shows `allow insecure wide links = noroot@Godzilla:~#` which is malformed. It should be:
+
+```ini
+[global]
+    follow symlinks = yes
+    wide links = yes
+    unix extensions = no
+    allow insecure wide links = yes
+```
+
+But that's separate from why it won't run - fix the `./` syntax first!
+
+---
+
+_**User**_
+
+@m:\Flamenco\software\Flamenco\flamenco-manager.yaml:16 this variable needs to be two-way. that's a good linux path, but windows needs M:\Flamenco
+
+---
+
+_**Agent (model kimi-k2.5, mode Agent)**_
+
+<think><details><summary>Thought Process</summary>
+The user is looking at the config on the Windows side (M:\ drive). They're noting that line 16 has the Linux path for shared_storage_path, and they need to make this a two-way variable so that Windows workers get the M:\Flamenco path.
+
+Looking at the config they shared earlier, they already have a variables section with shared_storage_path defined as a two-way variable. But the actual shared_storage_path setting on line 16 is still the raw Linux path.
+
+The issue is that Flamenco Manager uses shared_storage_path for where it stores files locally, but when sending paths to workers, it needs to translate them. The two-way variable should handle this, but they may need to reference the variable in the shared_storage_path or ensure the Manager is configured to use the variable for path translation.
+
+Actually, looking at the config more carefully:
+- Line 16: `shared_storage_path: /mnt/user/Cerberus Max/Flamenco` - this is where the Manager stores files
+- The variable `shared_storage_path` with is_twoway: true should be used for path translation in job commands
+
+The issue might be that the Manager is using the literal path in job commands instead of the variable. The two-way variable needs to be properly referenced.
+
+But actually, the user is asking about the config on the Windows side (M:\ drive). Wait, no - they're looking at the config on the Manager. If the Manager is running on Linux (Unraid), then shared_storage_path should be the Linux path. But when the Manager sends jobs to Windows workers, it needs to translate that path to M:\Flamenco.
+
+The two-way variable they added earlier should handle this. Let me check what the current config looks like and what they need to do.</details></think>
+
+---
+
+You're right - the Manager needs to use the two-way variable so Windows workers get `M:\Flamenco`. Looking at your config, you have:
+
+```yaml
+# Line 16 - Manager's local path (Linux)
+shared_storage_path: /mnt/user/Cerberus Max/Flamenco
+
+# Variables section with two-way translation
+variables:
+  shared_storage_path:
+    is_twoway: true
+    values:
+    - platform: linux
+      value: /mnt/user/Cerberus Max/Flamenco
+    - platform: windows
+      value: M:\Flamenco
+```
+
+**The issue:** The Manager is using the literal path `/mnt/user/Cerberus Max/Flamenco` in job commands instead of using the variable for translation.
+
+**Solution:** In Flamenco, the `shared_storage_path` in the main config (line 16) is where the Manager stores files locally. For cross-platform path translation to work in job commands, you need to ensure the Manager is configured to use the variable.
+
+**Check if the config is correct:**
+The variable should automatically translate paths in job commands. If it's not working, verify:
+
+1. **The Manager is using the variable in job paths** - Flamenco should automatically substitute `{shared_storage_path}` or use the variable when constructing job commands
+2. **The variable name matches** - it should be `shared_storage_path` (same name as the config setting)
+
+**If paths are still showing Linux format to Windows workers:**
+The issue might be that the Manager isn't configured to use the variable for the shared storage path in job commands. Check the Flamenco Manager web UI to ensure the variable is properly set up.
+
+**Quick test:**
+Submit a new job and check if the job command sent to the Windows worker shows `M:\Flamenco` or `/mnt/user/Cerberus Max/Flamenco`. If it's still showing the Linux path, the variable isn't being used.
+
+What does a new job command look like in the logs?
+
+---
+

TODO.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # todo
 
 * [X] When setting the Windows Flamenco Manager's shared storage to a local drive, the reparse points work locally. If I share that on the network over SMB, will it allow other Windows machines to read the reparse points properly? - Yes, but user must run `fsutil behavior set SymlinkEvaluation R2L:1` and `fsutil behavior set SymlinkEvaluation R2R:1`
-* [ ] Test how difficult it is to allow wide links on shares hosted by:
+* [X] Test how difficult it is to allow wide links on shares hosted by:
-  * [ ] Unraid
+  * [X] Unraid
   * [X] Synology - impossible