00:00:00:09 - 00:00:25:16 Speaker 3 There we go. I had definitely had I had to get the bloody Adblock on that because that was bad. Okay, okay, I'm going to move over to this side and then I'm going to do this. And here we are political ideologies. Teal list. This is the community rankings. it's this is pretty shit. It's it's absolutely an absolute fucking disgrace. 00:00:25:16 - 00:00:39:28 Speaker 3 That marks as a social democracy in Democrat socialism are as high as they are. It's very interesting that classical liberalism is the highest of all these, because classical liberalism isn't necessarily, 00:00:39:33 - 00:01:06:30 Speaker 3 Is it necessarily democratic? So this is interesting. It's interesting that like the fourth tier is bad to you. There's only four very good ideologies, kind of interesting and a good go to go to template, go to template. is there a button that forces all of them out because bloody hell, this is annoying. 00:01:06:34 - 00:01:11:54 Speaker 3 Random. Well, no, no. Fuck off, fuck off. 00:01:11:54 - 00:01:14:07 Speaker 3 Wait, what the fuck happened? 00:01:14:07 - 00:01:22:36 Speaker 3 Why the fuck did I do that? Go back, you prick! 00:01:22:41 - 00:01:28:44 Speaker 3 Oh, okay. That opened a new bloody, new window for that. This is annoying. 00:01:37:07 - 00:01:39:21 Speaker 2 Camera. 00:01:39:25 - 00:02:02:41 Speaker 3 What does that even mean? I see Hitler, he is on this. Explain each one. I don't know that, that might take a little bit of a while of. Oh, I'll get to him. It's a button on the bottom. The save a download reset. okay. It actually does work. That's good. And I guess we're going to go in, in in order here. 00:02:02:46 - 00:02:23:03 Speaker 3 just just, just alphabetical order. it's going to be pretty shit. It's kind of interesting. the the, the colors that they've chosen for all of these, the the brown is interesting. 00:02:23:08 - 00:02:49:58 Speaker 3 So that's that's got to be pretty interesting. Anyway, we're going to start off I'm going to start off, algorithm. I've heard of algorithm. but it's not like so. all right I'm going to I'm going to tear these out properly. 00:02:50:03 - 00:03:06:48 Speaker 3 Oh control B does things C d f and never heard of. That's how we're going to do this. This is how we're going to do this. 00:03:06:52 - 00:03:44:05 Speaker 3 Why do they have individual colors? I think it's just because of, like them mocking what the, like, general ideology is. So you can see the yellow ones are, Like, Yeah. The, like, I suppose, like right wing libertarian ones. I think so. just generally, the brown ones are like, some like fascist ish. 00:03:44:10 - 00:04:23:31 Speaker 3 Like, I think they're all fascist in some kind of way. That highly authoritarian, let's say, the black ones are, like, left anarchy. Anarchism. the pink ones are feminist, the red ones are, fucking commies. like, yeah, just leftist. and then the Greens, like, anti-human basically. they're like very environmentally focused. And so we mentioned George earlier. 00:04:23:31 - 00:04:42:40 Speaker 3 So that's him. I don't know what the purple is. There's only one purple on all of this, and I don't even know what it is. So we can just immediately put that I've never heard of. It's probably something decently based. I don't know. but we're going to go alphabetically here. I hope the Unabomber is on here. 00:04:42:40 - 00:04:57:03 Speaker 3 Yes. primitivism, I don't know, I don't think that's actually the Unabomber. Ted Kaczynski looks very different from that bloke. but, yes, he's on here. Primitivism. That's him. 00:04:57:07 - 00:05:15:53 Speaker 3 What do each tier mean? so everything on here, this is the best tier in comparison to all the others. Everything on Estia, is better than everything else in their. In the other tiers. that's that's basically what each tier is for, is that this is better than this. This is better than this. That's kind of what tier means. 00:05:18:56 - 00:05:43:52 Speaker 3 Like, that's that's kind of the funny thing about, like, naming all of the tiers on tier make a it's is it a it's literally just like items that made this happen because he, he made like a single tier list. It like just started this entire thing. I think it was items. I g I see John Lennon. Only a fool would say that. 00:05:43:57 - 00:05:51:06 Speaker 3 okay, so we got algorithm. I don't know much about algorithm. 00:05:51:11 - 00:06:01:57 Speaker 3 Because I don't know if I could tell you what it is, is the issue. 00:06:02:01 - 00:06:14:48 Speaker 3 I don't put it in. Never heard of or don't know enough, at or above. Let's let's do a, 00:06:14:53 - 00:06:24:13 Speaker 3 Do another here. Like two shades of gray. now, that's the same shade of gray. 00:06:24:18 - 00:06:37:58 Speaker 3 Going to do, like, just the ignorance to you. I don't know. 00:06:38:03 - 00:06:52:21 Speaker 3 Yeah. Not enough information. I'm going to put them on that because I don't I don't know enough about algorithm. I know they're, the anarchists and they rely on. 00:06:54:16 - 00:07:08:23 Speaker 3 Actually, do I know enough? I think I actually, yeah, I think I am going to assume that I know enough about those. So algorithm. I guess we'll start out with beta. So algorithm is like. 00:07:08:23 - 00:07:20:26 Speaker 3 Anarcho cap. actually I am going to look it up because it's like I was recently looking at this, a libertarian anti-state philosophy advocating for a society based on voluntary exchange, the agora. 00:07:20:26 - 00:07:34:22 Speaker 3 Oh, okay. Achieved through counter economics, participating in gray and black markets. to make the state irrelevant. Okay, okay. And that's the founder of it right there. Okay, okay. that's got to be at least eight here. That sounds pretty 00:07:34:22 - 00:07:48:38 Speaker 3 based. Agrarian ism. so that's it. It predates Jefferson, but Jefferson was an agrarian, it's free market capitalism without industrial, concentration. 00:07:48:38 - 00:08:13:05 Speaker 3 It's it's, it's got a little bit more state in it. They normally. But like, I think it's got to be pretty good. probably probably 80 year because it's probably not as good as an algorithm, which just wants the state to dissolve. unless I guess I'm wrong about it. But like, that makes me think of Jeffersonian ism, like, agrarian. 00:08:20:51 - 00:08:46:37 Speaker 3 There was a term Jeffersonian agrarian. Jeffersonian agrarian capitalism. I think this is what it's called. ultra. It's got to be pretty shit. Definitely got to be pretty shit. anarcha feminism and what's interesting is the other ones that have anarcho in them, like, you could clearly see that, Hanukkah is is an intentional choice here. And I think it's because they didn't they thought it was gendered or something like that. 00:08:46:37 - 00:08:55:35 Speaker 3 It was just automatically just fucking hilarious. I probably shouldn't have moved myself to this corner. 00:08:55:35 - 00:09:04:43 Speaker 3 Have I got enough room on this side? Yeah, I think I'll go here. That's probably a good idea. 00:09:04:48 - 00:09:30:48 Speaker 3 Anarcha feminism? well, it's anarchy, which is good, but it's feminism, which is shit. So we're going to have to go, that makes it pretty mid, doesn't it? Because feminism is shit, but anarchy is pretty neat. It's. Yeah. Yeah, it's probably around a C or something like that because it's like. 00:09:30:52 - 00:10:02:19 Speaker 3 Yeah I don't know. That's it's kind of difficult. Anarcho capitalism got to go to the very top obviously not much to say about that. Frankly. let's, let's actually give a couple of more because I skipped over some definitions that alt right is, Very ill defined in the, like, the popular, sense. it's basically it means alternative, right? 00:10:02:19 - 00:10:29:46 Speaker 3 It means that there were people there's the mainstream. Right. And there were people on the right who were like, we want an alternative, right? Who was still on the right. But we, the, like racist. We want to create like a, a society, a race based society. So it's like, collectivist, what is it called? 00:10:29:46 - 00:10:38:19 Speaker 3 What is it called? Let me bring up the political triangle here. 00:10:38:24 - 00:10:51:46 Speaker 3 It's like, what is it? absolutism. This one, 00:10:51:51 - 00:11:23:07 Speaker 3 There it is. it's like right wing absolutism. In a way, the right and left is kind of useless in this sense, but I, like the political triangle. Seems pretty useful, honestly. because it's it's, it's pro hierarchy. but it has a racial element to it. so it's, it's like, it may or may not be socialist. 00:11:23:12 - 00:11:29:21 Speaker 3 it really depends on the situation, but yeah. 00:11:29:26 - 00:11:39:06 Speaker 3 Pirate politics is such that one up after you're done. Yeah. So I've, I've wanted to go, 00:11:39:11 - 00:12:01:36 Speaker 3 Pirate politics. Pirate party. There's a label adopted by various political parties worldwide that share a set of values and policies, focus on civil rights in the digital age. The fundamental principles principles of pirate parties include copyright reform, dismantling copyright monopolies, patent reform. Strengthening civil rights, including government transparency. The right to privacy. Anonymity. Freedom of speech. Secrecy of correspondence. 00:12:01:36 - 00:12:35:57 Speaker 3 Principle of subsidiarity. respect for the highest standards of democracy. So they and they have a lot of things in common with me. but also a little bit shit. We'll probably going to put that, above anarcha feminism because it's not collectivist, at least. It is not inherently collectivist. Anything with feminism in the in the name is inherently collectivist because it's, assuming that women deserve this, particular attention. 00:12:36:02 - 00:12:59:12 Speaker 3 and it's, I mean, as far as, As far as, ideologies go, as far as, like, yeah, anything like that. Like if your principles entirely surround the differences between the sexes, it's like it's it's kind of missing the fucking point, isn't it? 00:12:59:17 - 00:13:22:38 Speaker 3 Blah blah blah buzzword buzzword buzzword. But I suppose so is this. If that's what it sounds like to you, then I guess like anything politically oriented is going to sound a little bit like that. Is that Charlie Kirk where I guess we'll get to it. But I want to be dominated by women. That's not what feminism entails, though. 00:13:22:43 - 00:13:49:30 Speaker 3 You could have a, femme dom without having, having that. Because feminism is this magical thing where women are simultaneously, victims and also, like, powerful. They get to get to play both sides at the same time. So like, okay, pick a line. You can either be pathetic or you could be, you know, egoistic and based. 00:13:49:30 - 00:13:55:49 Speaker 3 But. 00:13:55:54 - 00:14:19:54 Speaker 3 Google Play Store logo where anyway, anarcho communism has got to be pretty fucking shed. but probably not as bad as some of the others. It'll end up in the FTA. anarcho syndicalism also got to be pretty shit. but not as bad as anarcho communism. 00:14:19:59 - 00:14:54:16 Speaker 3 Syndicalists? yeah. Kind of gross. authoritarian conservatism. This is a good question. I'm not certain who the. They've listed their, But I may have to put that because it's inherently authoritarian. So I don't know how like if I would rather have it authoritarian on it's probably around the same level there because it's like you've got like two very collectivist ideologies, but the collectivist in the same in a anti state sense. 00:14:54:16 - 00:15:10:47 Speaker 3 So it's like, I guess that's all right, because insofar as I don't know, they're just they're not founded upon the same, principles as something based like anarcho capitalism. It's like 00:15:10:52 - 00:15:48:24 Speaker 3 It's like the people matter more than the individual. therefore no no no no no no no. It's because that's more of a conclusion that like the fundamental principle of anarchism is that like, you've got. no leaders. That's, that's like left anarchism is just, no rulers. whereas, anarcho capitalism is, is It's no, it it's not just no rule is it's voluntarism. 00:15:48:24 - 00:16:18:29 Speaker 3 It's a free society where no single person. Oh, right. Right. Because like, there's a difference between being ruled over and like, consensually entered it entering into, like, a free association with somebody who also, like, has more power than you just by dint of the fact that they have more shit like. Anyway, what is syndicalism? Syndicalism is. 00:16:18:43 - 00:16:47:09 Speaker 3 Oh, yeah. I have defined any of these. Anarcho syndicalism is it's basically what happens in Oryx and Crake, where you've got loads of, so that anarcho meaning anarchy, there is no state, there are no rulers, syndicalism, meaning that you form these syndicates and it's effectively just cartels like that. That's basically it. So they're not, they're not states. 00:16:47:13 - 00:17:22:19 Speaker 3 but they're like tiny little micro democracies that, Fight for hegemony effectively. so it's, it's like, loads of work. loads of guilds that get together and then like, form a micro state effectively. though it's not a state technically, for some reason, I don't know exactly why it, how they justify it left anarchism is it is a different, different idea, entirely than just, a consent based ethic. 00:17:22:19 - 00:18:01:10 Speaker 3 That's basically anarcho capitalism, a consent based ethic. you know, you, You can consent to, to selling your labor, but, you know, no one is permitted to force anybody else to do anything, against their own will. So some people would naturally going to be more wealthy, and some people have going to have businesses, and those businesses are going to have, all sorts of, consensual relationships that they can enter into people with in regards to employing them in regards to selling, certain goods and services. 00:18:01:10 - 00:18:09:39 Speaker 3 But, if I again, it's not what is it? 00:18:09:43 - 00:18:32:48 Speaker 3 That. No, nobody has the right to, to kill somebody just because they're rich, whereas syndicalism is like, no, the moment that you have more than me, you're oppressing me, which is a kind of I can't say that word is a bit stupid in it. Which political ideology with wings of fire land be, wings of fire lies somewhere in absolutism. 00:18:32:48 - 00:19:00:53 Speaker 3 So they, it's probably ntn regime. that's like little bullshit. I do not know how to say that, but it's it's anarchism effectively. it's it's maybe it's somewhere between here and there where it's tribe. though I don't know exactly, because it's Darwinism. Competition leads to progress. Winners get rewarded and go on to create more successful losers have to reinvent themselves of varnish. 00:19:00:58 - 00:19:27:35 Speaker 3 it's like a little bit closer to that, probably a little bit further this direction. so it's not like tribalism, but it's, definitely, definitely got, a monarchy, and a and a collection of monarchies. You've got a, several states and they rule over each other, but they're also tribes. it's, 00:19:27:40 - 00:19:57:42 Speaker 3 Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's that sounds about right. And if there's, some, you know, pretty shitty politics, then that's just inherent to having rulers and in and of itself. But, I viewers, I don't even see that cynic. Exactly which political ideology. Oh, yeah. You're already read that social democracy value versus democratic socialism. What? did you like, read that in here or something like that? 00:19:57:47 - 00:20:03:30 Speaker 3 Both of those are shit. But anyway, we'll get to it. 00:20:03:34 - 00:20:25:14 Speaker 3 But anarcho communism is is the same sort of idea where it's, there is no state, but communes arise. and any time anybody is rich, they are permitted to. And this is, this is, one of the the legal norms is they just permitted a fucking Gillum. which is evil and shit. So I was like, oh, anarchy. 00:20:25:14 - 00:20:53:48 Speaker 3 Meaning there are no, no rulers. That's pretty cool. but and insofar as a is it's, consensual, then it should it's legal to, to form a commune. but the moment that somebody else has more success than you does not permit you to just murder them, especially, and it's, it's another flavor of wrong if you do it via a, a mob. 00:20:53:48 - 00:21:32:28 Speaker 3 Right. So it's just it's just very shite overall. But because it's anarchist, it's got to go above the FTL. That's where, like, all of the dregs go. centrism. Probably probably better. Probably at, well, to be centrist if you got to be directly in the middle of C. So, Christian Democracy, Well, it's got democracy in the name, and it's got, it's got, Christianity in it, which is like, you know, Christianity has some decent ideas. 00:21:32:33 - 00:21:41:21 Speaker 3 I'm probably going to put that like above anarcha feminism, but, 00:21:41:26 - 00:22:04:25 Speaker 3 Because it, but it's anarchist, though. That's a tough one. It's not not as shit as these, but it's probably more than the rest of them. Civic nationalism. never heard of that one. Don't don't know what that is. Classical conservatism. This is the, the one, what's his name? Oh, what's his name? Who's the who's the. 00:22:04:30 - 00:22:40:43 Speaker 3 Classical conservative guy? Edmund Burke, that's the one. I thought Edmund Burke was pretty cool listening to him. he's got some. Got some pretty decent ideas. but conservatives still, like, love the state, so, I think the basis of the ideas, has the ability to, to progress past, like, statism in many ways. so it's not it's not it's not as bad as these ones, but it's not. 00:22:40:54 - 00:23:24:57 Speaker 3 No, it's not good by any stretch of the imagination. Classical fascism has got to go pretty fucking well. it's I think, because this is the interesting thing. So like, the classical left, right, continuum of pro status quo, pro hierarchy versus, anti status quo ante hierarchy. I reckon I like I, I fall, I used to fall on like one, one side of the other of that but like I kind of swung around it because like, I didn't really, 00:23:25:01 - 00:23:35:41 Speaker 3 I don't know, but like, the point being. I think, like. 00:23:35:46 - 00:24:05:25 Speaker 3 Pro hierarchy in sort of a romantic sense, as in, like you admire someone who is good at what they do. and seek to learn from them. is like a better, a better ethic than just I hate you because you're old. Like, doing better than me. and actually, like, being to the left when, there were, like, absolute monarchies and tyrants and despots. 00:24:05:30 - 00:24:17:57 Speaker 3 it was a very different thing then. Then, like. What is it then? Then? 00:24:18:02 - 00:24:45:45 Speaker 3 You know, just just I completely lost my train of thought that, so, like, fascism is collectivism, that, embraces the hierarchy. but also often it embraces a racial hierarchy that, like, in the, in the form of, Nazi ism. so it's like embracing the hierarchy in a sense is good, but it's not good per se. 00:24:45:56 - 00:25:14:42 Speaker 3 Right? So it's like especially when it's collectivist, and, and which is why it's authoritarian. It's explicitly because it's collectivist. So it's like, you know, democracy is fascism in that sense. It's just, less aggressive, generally speaking. But, I don't know if you look at the if you look at Europe nowadays, it's pretty damn aggressive. So, oh, by the way, Wings of Fire Land. 00:25:14:45 - 00:25:37:43 Speaker 3 We've completely forgotten it's called pirate, a period. I actually never heard anybody say it out loud. But anyway, classical liberalism got to be in a tier. Definitely. It's it's got to be up there. it's the, the founding philosophy, broadly speaking, of America, of the United States of America. And it's a pretty fucking good one. I reckon it's pretty good now. 00:25:37:43 - 00:26:07:15 Speaker 3 It's not not as good as aggressive because it's still statist, in many ways. But it this was laying the groundwork for, a, you know, objectivist, anarcho capitalist, anarcho objectivist, which is what I am. frame of mind. It was, it was laying the, the groundwork for that. And, unfortunately, it's, America has strewn pretty far from the original, intentions, the original classical liberal roots. 00:26:07:19 - 00:26:25:36 Speaker 3 you know what it meant to actually be a liberal, back in the day, which is which is unfortunate, but, you know, it's still still pretty good. Communalism. Don't know what that is. Deep ecology to know what that is. De Leon ism. do know what that is. Democratic socialism has got to be down here in here. 00:26:28:52 - 00:26:57:15 Speaker 3 Because it's democratic and democracy is shit and it's socialist, which is also shit. So it's just double shit now. It doesn't have, the racial elements, of these, probably I actually would have to put classical fascism above the alt right because, like Mussolini didn't. Maybe I could be wrong, but Mussolini does not like, as far as I recall. 00:26:57:20 - 00:27:16:41 Speaker 3 Like, he was just he was more focused on sort of a nationalist, collectivist sense of like this nation, needs to, you know, be great or whatever. so of course you would do this. What do you mean, rooster? What do you mean? Of course I would do this. What do you mean? 00:27:20:17 - 00:27:51:12 Speaker 3 But, like. Yeah, Mussolini didn't, didn't quite have the racial. Nastiness that, that that the Nazis had and that the alt right kind of seeks to bring back. So, like, it's got to be a little bit better than that. So that's probably a good, idea, but maybe it just wasn't as pronounced. Maybe I don't know as much about classical fascism as a la Mussolini because, fascism has kind of been absorbed by the fascism all, mustache man. 00:27:51:16 - 00:28:10:49 Speaker 3 so it's like, I could be required to plead ignorance on that one, but, like, I'm pretty sure the alt right is, like, explicitly just like racially collectivist, which is shite. And it's been shite, and I've, you know, I've got a video up on YouTube for of like, bloody, seven years ago about how shite it is. 00:28:10:54 - 00:28:28:18 Speaker 3 I don't know if it's any good. I think I made that video in DaVinci resolve over the course of like, three days or something like that. It was like the fastest video I ever made. And then I never made another video again because, fuck it. someone of your background, what does that mean? What do you mean, you people? 00:28:28:23 - 00:28:31:31 Speaker 2 What do you mean, you people? 00:28:31:35 - 00:28:35:00 Speaker 3 Come off it! 00:28:35:04 - 00:29:11:07 Speaker 3 Will have your hands tied up with all that. Yeah, evidently. Please tell. Tell me you get my reference. no, I don't think I do have your hands tied up with all that. No, I don't know, I don't know. distributors. I've never heard of it. Eco capitalism. let's think about this. So it's about, it's probably going to be right below, probably right around there, because it's, it's, environment. 00:29:11:12 - 00:29:46:49 Speaker 3 my girlfriend is probably pretty friendly to a lot of these ideas, actually. But it's like, Because it's capitalist meaning that, you know, you've got the voluntary free society, consenting individuals. You're capable of selling your labor. free association and all that. But it's also, the underlying premise that man ought not, to be the priority over his environment rather than man shaping his environment to his needs. 00:29:46:54 - 00:30:08:54 Speaker 3 he ought to conform to the environment or preserve it, as such, in some sort of a sense or, expend a certain amount of, what is it, of, of resources in order to, save the environment in a way. But the thing is with, with with eco capitalism, like, it it can kind of work with this. 00:30:08:58 - 00:30:32:19 Speaker 3 it's just got because it's like, you know, if you're anarcho capitalism, then an eco capitalist could be like, okay, I'm, I'm all cool with, the free association. I don't really, you know, I'm a little bit concerned that I can't use the state to, to preserve the environment, but, I could also use my capital, my resources to buy up a certain amount of the environment and preserve it myself, and, and, set about doing that. 00:30:32:19 - 00:31:11:32 Speaker 3 And I can also, fundraise and I can also use it as a good and a service in, you know, in the capitalistic landscape. So I can, do that. It's like, oh, yeah, you know, you could do that. Absolutely. but I think the underlying premise, that, you know, all things considered, it's probably going to be up here with classical conservatism because it's like a little bit, that there's actually like some, some decent overlap between these two, but like, it's a sort of thing where it's like, you know, that it's not, it's not too bad. 00:31:11:37 - 00:31:43:16 Speaker 3 it's just a little too authoritarian. because it has a state, anything that's got a state is too authoritarian. Right? Princess and the frog. Oh, right. Somebody of your background? Yeah. I remember that now. Eco fascism. Yeah. That's got to go, like, straight to the fucking bottom. Because democratic socialism. 00:31:43:21 - 00:31:52:42 Speaker 3 Eco socialism. It's the same fucking thing. Like it's the exact same thing. 00:31:52:46 - 00:32:20:18 Speaker 3 Because I'm. Maybe I'm not as familiar with those, but they've probably better than, like, classical fascism. I know, but they're probably on, like, the same level. Yeah, definitely. For certain. because eco fascism is like fascism with an ecological focus, an environmental focus and an environmental holism is shit. eco fascism is, I see. Do I hate socialism more than fascism? 00:32:20:22 - 00:32:31:09 Speaker 3 because fascism is socialism. Because, we're worried movement. It's hard to sort of tear those because, like. 00:32:31:14 - 00:33:08:14 Speaker 3 There's they're all wrong. It's it's so hard to, like, compare against each other. Egoism. this is actually kind of difficult. I probably have to put it up a little bit there because egoism is an excellent, like I'm thinking Nietzsche, right? Not some of the other shitheads. like, egoism is a pretty fantastic thing. And, you know, it's part of the basis of objectivism, but not not egoism from some of the premises that they come from, because objectivism comes from first principles, from Aristotle. 00:33:08:19 - 00:33:40:32 Speaker 3 but it's, Objectivism is rational egoism and egoism is, sort of the foundation of that. It's it's It's part of the reason why Objectivism is, is all about selfishness and, you know, the virtue thereof. it's it's in an esthetic sense, egoism is pretty based. in a what is it in a legal sense? 00:33:40:32 - 00:34:18:03 Speaker 3 It's got some holes in it. Let's, let's say let's leave it at that. Ethnic nationalisms got to be pretty shit. hard to say if I would place this, because it's ethnic meaning, like, you know, racial collectivism and it's nationalist, I don't know, because nationalism, when I was a status, I reckon nationalism was actually like a pretty decent idea because it's like, well, you've got your nation and your nation worries about your nation's issues, and you go your nation and you care about your issues and etc.. 00:34:18:07 - 00:34:38:06 Speaker 3 there was a very interesting person who was like, kind of just championing nationalism in a liberal sense. Right. where it's like, you know, you care about your own, and, you know, you sort of like, leave everybody else alone. sort of an isolationist nationalism is like a decent idea when I was a state is. 00:34:38:06 - 00:34:46:45 Speaker 3 But now that I'm not a state is is like, oh, yeah, well, it's just kind of shit for first principles, isn't it? 00:34:46:50 - 00:34:53:23 Speaker 3 But, that's the question. Democratic socialism is. 00:34:53:28 - 00:35:28:35 Speaker 3 Oh, that's difficult because, like, I'm trying to decide which one of these I hate the most. And there's so many, premises here that that are just absolutely despicable. Because, gosh, it's like do. Is racial collectivism worse than, anti-human? Like. Like racial, in that. No. Anti-Human, like pro-environment, like environment over human at at its base principles. 00:35:28:35 - 00:36:02:46 Speaker 3 Is that worse than because I suppose you could say, what a Star Wars, the Republic. it's not much of a republic. It's a, it's really a, democracy. So it's pretty shit. Yeah, it's pretty shit. Yeah, it's it's basically a unitary republic. It's basically somewhere over here. Something like that. there's a lot more freedom than if you were here or here. 00:36:02:51 - 00:36:19:20 Speaker 3 and I think, I think the Empire is actually right here. The empire is literally China. because it's just just tyranny. That's it. Very opposite of that, basically just right there. 00:36:19:25 - 00:37:03:11 Speaker 3 But I think. Yeah, yeah, yeah, they just basically moved to this, this from this flavor of shit to this flavor of worse shit. somehow, somehow, that's worse, but only because of its distance from here. but the force is good. Well, yeah, the force is good, but the Republic is shit like, just because, the, the Jedi were irrational in many ways and that they were, you know, captured to do this Democratic, this terrible democratic superstate, that doesn't mean that it's, not any less shit. 00:37:03:11 - 00:37:26:52 Speaker 3 Right? Like Jedi and neat. The force is good. And actually, the force is a kind of a good esthetic. it aligns with the benevolent universe, esthetic principle of Objectivist esthetics. So, it's just so hard to choose this one, though. 00:37:26:57 - 00:37:41:16 Speaker 3 Ethnic nationalism, I think. I think it might have to go above these two because, 00:37:41:21 - 00:37:52:11 Speaker 3 Just be like you're embracing a collectivist. 00:37:52:16 - 00:38:00:21 Speaker 3 It's a collectivist ethic. but it's not an anti-human ethic. 00:38:00:25 - 00:38:18:24 Speaker 3 It's just kind of weird that this is collectivist and anti-human. So that's got to put it lower because it's like it's anti-human. It's just if you don't think about if you think about it, it's anti-human. But if you don't think about it, it's just like, well, I'm a human. And none of the other things that look like humans remotely are technically human. 00:38:18:34 - 00:38:48:26 Speaker 3 Like, that's what's so, brutal. And, you know, that's what I and ran said, an ideology for and of brutes. racial collectivism is so but it's it's not anti-human. It's just anti other human. So it's got a weird cause he puts his own and yes, that's the point of the fucking deal is what do you what what do you reckon George ism. 00:38:48:31 - 00:39:15:42 Speaker 3 it's basically, a semi stateless society. but land ownership is the. Yeah, it's literally the they're just pushing land ownership is the only tax. so maybe it's. Oh, no, it can't be on the same tier as the rest of these is probably just right above centrism. because centrism is, you know what? I actually have to put pirate politics above centrism. 00:39:15:42 - 00:39:42:20 Speaker 3 The centrism is very democratic. It's just like whatever everyone else thinks generally is an aggregate, is a centrism is basically just like the, the the fucking, put your head down and agree with and nod along with what everybody else says. and unfortunately, Jordan Peterson sort of falls into this category just a little bit. He's it when he talks about Nietzsche, it's like he's up here. 00:39:42:20 - 00:40:00:04 Speaker 3 Right? But then, when he talks about like, you know, when he talks about pragmatism, he ends up getting pulled in the centrist direction. It's like, shut up, shite. Green anarchism. I forget if that's. 00:40:00:09 - 00:40:36:40 Speaker 3 Let's let's verify this green and, and and, schism. eco anarchism. Okay? Okay. Deep ecology, stateless anti-capitalist society viewing the domination of nature as a deeply intertwined with human hierarchies like the state, patriarchy and economic exploitation. That sounds pretty fucking shit. so that's got to go on this tier. let's do this. Between these, now, all of these are pretty much fucking tied. 00:40:36:45 - 00:40:53:19 Speaker 3 Maybe the syndicalists go a little bit higher because they're at least concerned about being productive in a sense, but they're basically it's basically like, interchangeable. I guess we'll put it that. Let me look up. 00:40:53:24 - 00:41:16:13 Speaker 3 Authoritarian conservatism, ideology, combining strict traditionalism, hierarchical social values, and strong nationalism with an autocratic government to enforce order. focuses on preserving traditional institutions, often religious, and suppressing radical movements, distinguishing itself from revolutionary populist nature of fascism. it's just order. 00:41:21:22 - 00:41:48:27 Speaker 3 I wonder if that makes it better or worse than the rest of these. Got to be the same to you. that's that's difficult. That's difficult. Jordan Peterson is my dad. Well, I didn't realize we had, I actually forget what his son's name is. The one with feminine goals, as you said. individualist anarchism. That's basically just this. 00:41:48:27 - 00:42:15:10 Speaker 3 So, kind of just belongs up there. maybe, maybe along with algorithm. Probably. Probably up on the same or is. That's pretty good, George. I don't know who that is. left to libertarianism. 00:42:15:15 - 00:42:51:26 Speaker 3 political philosophy that combines a commitment to individual freedom and bodily autonomy with an egalitarian approach to economics and natural resources. Okay. So it's like decent. It's it's got a good foundation, but it becomes shit in the end. That probably puts it at around the same tiers that, liberal conservatism definitely got to be higher than classical conservatism because it's, that's this is basically, a lot of what, what American politics has been in many ways. 00:42:51:31 - 00:43:14:10 Speaker 3 It's like, classical conservatism. Oh, yeah. And classical conservatism can be summed up by, the The Wall principle, as, as lined out by Edmund Burke. It's the, the idea that, you come up to a wall in the middle of a field and say you purchased the field and, you know, one man may say, what is this fence doing here? 00:43:14:10 - 00:43:39:40 Speaker 3 I'm just going to tear it down and do whatever I want with this. whereas another man might say, stop before I tear this fence down, I'm going to make absolutely certain I know what it's for. it's it's, you know, let's find out if this is good, if it's useful. but not just that, but that it's. 00:43:39:45 - 00:43:47:59 Speaker 3 I. I will refuse to tear this wall down, and also that I will, 00:43:48:04 - 00:44:11:28 Speaker 3 What is it? I will, not I will prevent anybody else from also doing so until I figure out what the hell it's for. And only once I figure out what it's for and that it is, is not useful or counterproductive, you know, it's not needed. Will I allow it to be torn down? that's basically what classical conservatism is. 00:44:11:28 - 00:44:34:10 Speaker 3 Liberal conservatism is just, that sort of an idea. It's basically just, classical American, politics in many ways. What are the Republicans called? Democrats? Liberals, because the the term semantically shifted because back in the day, liberal literally meant liberty. It means you like liberty. Whereas in the modern sense of the term, it just means that you like it. 00:44:34:10 - 00:44:57:31 Speaker 3 When the government steals a lot of shit from people and gives it to other people. So effectively, liberal means socialists today. which is pretty shite to the rest of the world. They still think that, liberal means that you like liberty. It's just in America in particular. there was a semantic drift from it where it doesn't mean liberal, it means liberal. 00:44:57:31 - 00:45:09:13 Speaker 3 It doesn't mean liberals. And you love liberty. It means liberal, as in you liberal love spending other people's money. Liberal amounts of other people's money. 00:45:09:18 - 00:45:42:06 Speaker 3 Liberal. Liberal. Liberal. Liberal. Liberal feminism. let me just. So I know, foundational branch of feminist thought that seeks to achieve gender equality through political and legal reform rather than revolution. probably probably a little bit below anarcho feminism, because it's collectivist, but, it's not violently collectivist, like some of these are, 00:45:42:11 - 00:45:48:24 Speaker 3 Like, these are not anarchism, properly understood. 00:45:48:29 - 00:46:21:49 Speaker 3 Actually, let's look up and, feminism. Combines anarchist philosophy with feminist principles. it sounds so shit. It sounds harsh, yet at least. viewing patriarchy as a fundamental form of involuntary coercive hierarchy that must be abolished alongside the state and capitalism. So it's so funny that anarchism is all about like, we need to to get rid of, capitalism, which is literally just the free market. 00:46:21:49 - 00:46:29:32 Speaker 3 It's literally just the free association of people trading. That's literally what it is. 00:46:29:37 - 00:46:36:29 Speaker 3 Anti hierarchy is not a good place to to begin your, place that. 00:46:44:57 - 00:46:48:51 Speaker 3 Yeah. 00:46:48:56 - 00:47:15:55 Speaker 3 Yeah. Difficult. But Luxemburg ism. Dunno what that is. Maoism. Mao isms got to go, like straight at the fucking bottom, right? because there was the, the anti status quo like cultural revolution they were destroying of years worth of history in you know, of ancient China because they think they're such geniuses that they could just replace it with whatever they wish. 00:47:16:00 - 00:47:39:51 Speaker 3 so they can engineer the, the next society of obedient state followers. absolutely despicable. Hatred of the good as such. It's got that, it's got absolute collectivism at every single level. but it's not racist. 00:47:39:56 - 00:47:46:52 Speaker 3 That's the funny bit. It's not racist. 00:47:46:57 - 00:48:13:36 Speaker 3 It's it's, a class because. Okay, that's the only difference between fascism. and like, hardcore communism is that it's, It's it's, Like Marxism and Maoism is basically just an implementation of Marxism. 00:48:13:41 - 00:48:49:27 Speaker 3 It's it's like, You prioritize and and you privilege, it's a class based dichotomy rather than a race based or, you know, heritage based, like, that's, that's, the, the fascist, prioritizes the, the race or the, the nation per se, whereas, and in an ancestral sense in many ways, whereas the I don't know, at least, 00:48:49:32 - 00:49:03:57 Speaker 3 Like, if this is a this is a difficult sentence, I suppose, but like, at least fascists have the wisdom or perhaps the bizarre, like, 00:49:04:01 - 00:49:31:11 Speaker 3 Like, what is it like devotion to what came before? Because they're not so foolish as to just completely do away with it and to just despise it as such? I don't know, like being able to respect what is bigger than you is kind of important. I don't know. It's it's got to go straight to the bloody bottom, though, so definitely near the bottom, but it's not as, 00:49:34:39 - 00:49:41:45 Speaker 3 Oh, that's difficult. 00:49:41:49 - 00:49:59:07 Speaker 3 Like, this is not hatred for the good as such. Is that is the difficult bit. That might be part of why it belongs. Because they're just two different brands of collectivism. How do I like choose which is worse out of the two of them? 00:49:59:12 - 00:50:26:09 Speaker 3 No. Hatred of the good as such is probably probably going to. It's good to put it a little bit higher because like, I don't know, it's just it's just entirely despicable. You could probably also, look at this as, the tier list of, like, how many people have been killed by it? Well, I don't know. I suppose that that requires an ideological framing. 00:50:29:06 - 00:50:39:40 Speaker 3 Lib. Todd. Exactly. Oh, the hopefully the the censorship boss didn't hear that one. hopefully I didn't quite understand it. 00:50:39:45 - 00:51:07:12 Speaker 3 Right now, you son of anarchy. I don't know what that means. Anarchy is getting rid of capitalism. Then how anarcho capitalism work. Yeah, that's the entire question because some people think anarchy, some people's definition in classical anarchist definition is, anti hierarchies as such. but if you, if you define it as literally no rulers, then there's a voluntary society where some people, ruling over their own property, and they've got more than it, than you have. 00:51:07:12 - 00:51:40:15 Speaker 3 And so they're up a hierarchy. Yup. A flag for hate speech and hateful behavior. Get fucking fox. I didn't I didn't realize that it had actually be able to tell about, anything about that. So the AI is pretty powerful, isn't it? Mao Zedong? Yes. Very evil man indeed. Paleo conservatism. That's called dinosaur fossil museums. I mean, that'd be pretty cool if it was just entirely about preserving the field of paleontology. 00:51:40:19 - 00:52:05:25 Speaker 3 See, it's based actually, it's based. I see the golden ones. Very. Hi. Yes, I'm a liberal. Liberal. Liberal Liberal. Marxism-Leninism got to be straight to the vulgar bottom. it's got to be like neck and neck with Mao ism. Probably interchangeable. Marx is, definitely going to be at the very bottom. 00:52:05:30 - 00:52:13:20 Speaker 3 Like that. They're all interchangeable. Really. They're all different forms of Marxist feminism. 00:52:13:25 - 00:52:17:59 Speaker 3 It's shared. But, 00:52:18:04 - 00:52:53:21 Speaker 3 Because it's hatred of the good as such and collectivist along, the, the sexual alignment. So branch of feminist theory that analyzes how capitalism exploits women through private property and uncompensated domestic life. But they they just don't even know what they mean by exploiting Asian exploitation is when I consensually agree to taking a wage. When I could essentially, what would I consent to to sell my labor? 00:52:53:26 - 00:53:27:49 Speaker 3 That's that's just exploitation. Tucker. Now, Marxist feminism, that's pretty bad. It's pretty bad because it's collectivist. It's got to be like right along these lines. It's hatred of the good as such. Was that worse or better than being anti-human? It's the same thing though. Like these are all interchangeable. I don't know, it's difficult monarchies. It's better than all democracies. 00:53:27:54 - 00:53:35:21 Speaker 3 Better than all democracies by default. 00:53:35:26 - 00:53:37:00 Speaker 2 A little, a little, 00:53:37:05 - 00:54:07:45 Speaker 3 Probably below George ism, which is kind of insane to think about, but like, it's it's still better than all of these other collectivist, you know, shite ones. mutualism, doesn't it? Along the same lines as the others. symbiotic relationship. Oh, right. Anarchist school of thought and economic theory. Advocating for a society based on worker control of production, free markets and equitable exchange. 00:54:07:45 - 00:54:17:18 Speaker 3 If you have worker control of production, then it's not necessarily a free market. Because workers don't know jack shit about actually investing in things. 00:54:17:23 - 00:54:44:22 Speaker 3 And inevitably it ends up in just cartels and cartels a shit. unions or cartels and cartels or shit. There you go. probably right alongside anarcho syndicalism. probably all of these probably end up in, like, the same place, right? Green anarchism. Yeah. Econo. Because, I mean, I looked up that for, just wanted to verify National Bolshevism. 00:54:44:22 - 00:55:03:24 Speaker 3 It's the best of both worlds. Hatred of the good for, you know, as such. but, there's not even a racial collectivism, though, is it? It's it's, Yeah. And there's bubbles, foreign. 00:55:03:29 - 00:55:17:43 Speaker 3 It's all of these are interchangeable at this point. It's pretty shit. National capitalism is the exact same fucking thing. is that Pinochet? I think it may be. 00:55:17:48 - 00:55:23:19 Speaker 3 I think it is. I think it is. 00:55:23:24 - 00:55:48:03 Speaker 3 Golden is high. Black is mixed. High green is mixed. Low red is low. Brown is low. Yep. That's right. It sounds about right. National syndicalism got to be just as fucking shit as the rest of these. Nazi ism got to be right down here. And it's, 00:55:48:07 - 00:56:09:33 Speaker 3 Yeah, it's better than these because there's no hatred of the good as as such, there's a little bit of egoist, egoism in there, but it's not rational whatsoever. it's just kind of a flavor around the edges because they had slight, influences by Nietzsche. But, Nietzsche was also completely distorted by, what was it? 00:56:09:33 - 00:56:37:52 Speaker 3 Nietzsche's sister completely just distorted the entire idea. but it's also, the alt right is slightly better than Nazi ism because they didn't kill as many people yet, I guess. I guess we'll have a look at that. Blue is mixed. Yes, indeed. Blue, blue sort of deserves to be mixed. neo classical liberalism. 00:56:37:57 - 00:57:12:12 Speaker 3 This is like, what? Ben Shapiro wishes he was right. traditional classical liberal commitments to free markets and economic liberty with a modern focus on social justice, argues that stringent protection of negative economic liberties benefits the most vulnerable and provides an empirical, more morally ambitious framework for self authorship. That is pretty fucking based. but probably, yeah, it's probably better than it's probably like right, right up there actually, because, it's statist. 00:57:12:16 - 00:57:34:18 Speaker 3 but it's not, not too badly status. I feel like the, I should split this into the status and the anti statist, like these could probably belong in their own separated, but I don't think I'll bump them up. neo conservatism. It's got to be pretty fucking shit. 00:57:34:23 - 00:58:00:04 Speaker 3 Yeah. Probably belongs here at T is getting a little bit crowded here. Neo liberalism. This is the other shit. One. free market capitalism, deregulation, free trade, privatization and minimal state intervention in the economy. It emphasizes individual liberty, competition, and shifting the provision of public goods to the private sector. That's Milton Friedman, right? That got to be better. 00:58:00:09 - 00:58:09:37 Speaker 3 neo cons, who actually neo cons belong much further along the line here? 00:58:09:42 - 00:58:19:13 Speaker 3 Yeah, possibly down here, because neo cons are, 00:58:19:18 - 00:58:46:56 Speaker 3 Let's let's let's verify, start imagine the US during the 60s and 70s, conservative values with an assertive, interventionist foreign policy. Yeah. That shit promoting democracy and national interest. Yeah, that shit. strong military, free markets, proactive, sometimes preemptive international action. Yes. that would be the three legged stool. I feel like, I feel like paleo conservatism. 00:58:47:01 - 00:59:16:00 Speaker 3 they put they put Ronald Reagan as the face of that. I'm pretty sure he's not a very good paleo conservative. he's more on eating more of a neoconservative. So that's interesting. Objectivism got to be right up at the top, obviously, just 100% the greatest ideology I've ever composed, ever constructed, the greatest, philosophical system ever derived by man was also derived by a woman. 00:59:16:05 - 00:59:50:32 Speaker 3 But, derived by man. That's basically what that means. gets its roots back all the way from Aristotle. And that's the, you know, from first principles. Aristotle. you know, completely pops the Descartes bubble. it's not, I think, therefore I am. It's, it is therefore it is, you know, a is a pretty wonderful primary, reality is as such and reality can be known, can be, integrated, reverse engineered. 00:59:50:37 - 01:00:26:30 Speaker 3 explored, derived, and rational principles can be derived from, existence per se. It's bloody fantastic. you know, minimal state though if she had, if she had any sort of a legal theory because she was not a legal theorist, then she would have realized that the that politics is not a valid, a valid field of philosophy, but she, she never really studied legal theory. 01:00:26:35 - 01:00:58:43 Speaker 3 but the roots of Objectivism being, the primacy of existence, is precisely where you end up with, anarcho objectivism, you know, just a. A completely consenting society, a freely consenting society. where the only things you're not permitted to do are things that are, violations of the rights of others. 01:00:58:48 - 01:01:28:13 Speaker 3 Bloody fantastic. Bloody bass. I just realized my mini fridge was open. It's been open since I, cracked it open a bit ago. What does Eric Andre land? I have no idea. where does water make you? The starting to forget frogs. Okay. Alex Jones, 01:01:28:18 - 01:01:48:53 Speaker 3 Goodness, it's it's difficult. I think he may be an anarchist in in many ways, in 2012, he was certainly an anarchist. But, I think a lot of this pro-Trump, like, pro nationalist stuff is a little bit, 01:01:48:58 - 01:02:01:51 Speaker 3 I'm not certain if he's, like, here or, he's definitely not here. 01:02:01:55 - 01:02:06:08 Speaker 3 Like. 01:02:06:13 - 01:02:18:22 Speaker 3 Yeah. Neo cons are all the way over there. It's interesting. Yeah. I'm not quite certain where he would be. 01:02:18:27 - 01:02:37:04 Speaker 3 Alex Jones political ideology. prolific. Because it's, like, far right radio host, media personality and prolific anti-government conspiracy theorist. It's like that makes the anarchist in many ways. 01:02:37:09 - 01:03:05:16 Speaker 3 Far right and populist. Strong elements of extreme populism and right wing nationalist sentiment. Well, because he's like, nationalist, but not in the sense that he like, he doesn't want the government to, to have a lot of power because, like, I don't know, it's kind of interesting. Anti globalism. Yes. new, focus his rhetoric on fighting a perceived new world order. 01:03:05:21 - 01:03:26:01 Speaker 3 Paleo conservatism and constitutionalism. describe himself as a paleo conservative with it with a and an aggressive constitutionalist claiming to champion traditional American values against modern political shifts. so I guess you could say he's like paleo con. 01:03:26:06 - 01:03:55:36 Speaker 3 But like paleo cons, paleo. Wait, wait, where was. Yeah, paleo cons are over here. Pat Buchanan yeah, yeah, he's probably somewhere over here. You mean he may be a little bit more this direction than, Yeah, something like that. I think, Ben Shapiro is, like, right here. He's like paleo libertarian, nearly. But, like, he's between paleo libertarian and neocon. 01:03:55:36 - 01:04:33:13 Speaker 3 Like, he's right in between, right? In that, though I think he could certainly be convinced in this direction. in many ways. But he's got some, a couple of decently collectivists, a little bit of that, that a little bit, see, what do you call it? Priors, let's say paleo conservatism. But, It's probably got to go like below neo conservatism. 01:04:33:18 - 01:04:45:40 Speaker 3 That's difficult because like, no, it's got to go higher because it's more liberal just a little bit. 01:04:45:45 - 01:05:27:46 Speaker 3 Primitivism. Got to be straight to FDA. it's, Hatred of productivity is such, like, there's a bit of a hatred of the good as such. it's inherently anti-human, and it's anti-human before it's any of these other things. So it's got to go below all of the, the racists. because the racists, or the nationalists, rather because the nationalists at least believe, that a certain that there are people in the, you know, there's pro human insofar as it's humans like me, but this is just anti-human through and through. 01:05:27:51 - 01:05:48:24 Speaker 3 so like being, being pro human in a, in a way that is, I don't know, it's difficult to hear it because it's like a, if you're anti-human. it's difficult, but, the primitivism got to be you. Ooh. It's got to be, 01:05:48:29 - 01:06:11:31 Speaker 3 It's got to be down there. Yeah, it's definitely got to be down here now. No no no no. Yeah. Is definitely down at the very bottom because it's hatred of the good. As such, it's, hatred of human thriving as such. These, these guys would be like, oh, yeah, I kind of love human thriving insofar as it's the, the poor people who are thriving. 01:06:11:31 - 01:07:00:34 Speaker 3 Those those poor people. I feel so sorry for. In other words, we could just, like, kill, kill everybody else is is not doing as badly as them. And then everybody's going to be starving soon, right. these eventually lead to this. If they, if they have any sort of success, they either lead to this or if they, they devolve into, I guess any, any system can turn into anything, but, radical conservatism, radical conservatism, the, political ideology that combines traditional conservative values such as national sovereignty, cultural cultural homogeneity, who says though, like, who gets to say that? 01:07:00:34 - 01:07:26:48 Speaker 3 That's my issue with this is it's like, yeah, I understand the benefits of it, but who gets to say that? Who gets to say that everybody has to be the same, culturally speaking and social hierarchy with a revolutionary, radical desire to dismantle established liberal institutions and norms, it often operates as a populist movement against global elites, pushing for a return to traditionalism through abrupt structural change. 01:07:26:53 - 01:07:58:16 Speaker 3 Probably right alongside these, because the only reason these are not at the low, which here are at the bottom of this own tears, because they're also anarchists, makes it a bit difficult. Where does Martin Luther King Junior land? he's a hard code Democrat, the most democracy lover. So he's a little bit shite. he. But he's also, a, you know, egalitarianism. 01:07:58:16 - 01:08:06:40 Speaker 3 And, you know, I don't know, he's he's still a collectivist, but it was more about like, about class than race. 01:08:08:49 - 01:08:35:41 Speaker 3 and he was the entire reason that, that America could, like, at least begin to get over racial collectivism in some sense is it's all the Marxist that have fucking that up. because the Marxists see racism as something that's actually very useful. But like, I don't know, eventually when you when you mix this in with that, then you end up with, with something that looks like this, except in the, the anti status quo direction, which is pretty cringe. 01:08:35:46 - 01:09:02:05 Speaker 3 So he's probably, He's probably somewhere around here, somewhere around here because, a lot of what he was championing was, was pretty good. But he did have a lot of Marxist poison in his system. so that that does make it difficult. 01:09:02:10 - 01:09:10:29 Speaker 3 Yeah. Radical feminism. It's got to be pretty shit. 01:09:10:34 - 01:09:34:48 Speaker 3 Foundational branch of the feminist movement that identifies patriarchy as a fundamental root of women's oppression. It's there's so many wrong, principles with that. So many, so many bad priors that, believe society must be fundamentally restructured to eliminate male supremacy. So it's like male supremacy that's a could exist. That's not a thing. And males are not supreme in, in this society. 01:09:34:48 - 01:10:11:05 Speaker 3 And it's not exactly the case that that happened like historically classically either. it's just there, there were different, spheres in which women were involved. I never got like a recording of it, but I debated a feminist on TikTok. just really trying to effectively say that, like, why? well, because the entire prompt was, you know, I'm a feminist. 01:10:11:10 - 01:10:34:45 Speaker 3 if you are like, yeah, feminism, if you disagree, then then join the live. And so I joined it, and it's kind of funny because some people would only go on for like 15 minutes or so, maybe less than that, like 5 to 10 minutes something. but then I like hogged it for like the last hour. And I think it's probably because, like, we probably just had like similar, IQ or something like that. 01:10:34:45 - 01:11:07:16 Speaker 3 And so we had a very interesting conversation. it was before I was, really getting into Objectivism. so I had a lot of, a lot of, Peter Ian like appreciation of democracy, which was kind of shit. but like the main point that I was really trying to stress is like, why? Why do you so badly want to identify with the label of feminism when what you're saying can apply to all people equally? 01:11:07:21 - 01:11:26:44 Speaker 3 And you you say that these principles apply to all people equally, then why do you need to focus on women in particular? It's like all women have got these issues that we need to focus. It's like you're saying that you want to prioritize women when it comes to, to like how you want your egalitarianism to to go forth. 01:11:26:44 - 01:12:05:42 Speaker 3 But it's more like it's like if you if your fundamental principles were egalitarian, then you wouldn't have to worry about, any particular group of people. That's kind of the difference between a, sort of a, like a fairness, like a collectivism of this sort where it's just like, this twisted and warped sense of what exploitation and justice is, versus one that is like racially based because or, just immutable characteristics based. 01:12:05:42 - 01:12:31:15 Speaker 3 It's a collectivism, that has more to do about what you are than who you are. or how you're doing, which is, you know, this is all about how you doing? so, yeah, it was an interesting sort of conversation because it's like you just can't really get them to step away from that idea. But, I would on the discord after that because people were encouraging me to join the discord and, it was pretty shit. 01:12:31:19 - 01:12:53:00 Speaker 3 Let's say. It was like absolute fucking shit. Because, like, it's not just like feminists on there. Evidently there were like tons of, subjective moral relativists, and it was just absolutely bizarre talking to them. It's like, you know, you're in this feminist server and you believe that rape is a social construct. It's like, what the fuck is wrong with you? 01:12:53:04 - 01:12:59:19 Speaker 3 Like, that was absolutely insane. 01:12:59:24 - 01:13:20:33 Speaker 3 I don't know, it's just absolutely nuts. And it's always difficult when you're trying to have a good conversation with somebody and you just have someone screeching in the background constantly. Just absolute embrace of irrationality entirely. It's like I'm trying to have an openness conversation here. Shut your mouth. You're a fool and you deserve to be silenced in in shame of your idiocy. 01:13:20:33 - 01:13:36:15 Speaker 3 But if you if you had enough IQ to understand your idiot, then you wouldn't be speaking right now. When am I? Where am I on the Google Play Store logo? Oh, is that what you mean? 01:13:36:20 - 01:13:38:30 Speaker 2 The. 01:13:38:35 - 01:13:44:27 Speaker 3 You're probably somewhere in here. Most likely because you're a normie. Probably somewhere in here. 01:13:46:48 - 01:13:53:19 Speaker 3 Like, 01:13:53:24 - 01:14:31:07 Speaker 3 Yeah. I mean, like, what form of government do you think is just that's that's the question, really? Anyway, radical feminism. it believes absolute bullshit about, how humanity works, how a sexually dimorphic species work, how rationality came to be in the first place. It's like if you if you don't understand the origins of rationality, you can you if you understand the origins of rationality, if you understand the origins of consciousness, and you absolutely cannot be a feminist in the sense that you believe that women are inherently oppressed, or that men have always been rulers, that there's this male supremacy, it's like, you absolutely don't understand a thing about anything, if that's what you 01:14:31:07 - 01:15:02:50 Speaker 3 reckon. Right? so, like, it's more about, like the their, what do you call it that metaphysics needs a lot of work, like significant amount of work because like, they some if you go into metaphysics, you realize that, that the entire sexual dichotomy really doesn't apply, like, at all to, the nature of consciousness and the nature of rights. 01:15:02:55 - 01:15:40:52 Speaker 3 so there's no point in bringing in feminism into it. It's like, okay, but there's like, inequality is something it's there's there's just never a never any sort of like base principle. It's just a it's entirely reactionary. That's just part of the issue with feminism per se. It's just entirely reactionary. it's got a probably got to go below these ones, because the only reason these are as high as they are is because the the means by which they do things, means that I can at least get along with, more so than the rest of these, they're end goals are just as evil. 01:15:40:52 - 01:16:03:11 Speaker 3 But, No, this is foolish. I don't know, I don't even know if I'd say that feminism is is. No, no, no, feminism is evil because it's irrational. the lack of rationality within feminism is what makes it evil. because irrationality is inherently evil. It's evasion. Evasion through and through. rather than deciding that, well, I'm upset about the about what I'm seeing in the world. 01:16:03:11 - 01:16:26:42 Speaker 3 And, I'm upset about the way that I'm treated as a woman for being a woman and not realizing that the reason you dislike that is because you're not being seen as you. You're being seen as what you are, rather than who you are. Maybe if you would realize that and integrated and understood, and explored, those principles better than you wouldn't, you know, just be railing against, the man, as it were. 01:16:26:57 - 01:16:55:05 Speaker 3 Like, maybe you would actually have, embraced some more individualist principles and maybe you could have ended up in based land over here, but no, right. Libertarianism. Let's see. probably higher than left libertarianism. unfettered free market capitalism, absolute private property rights and extreme individual autonomy. That's basically anarcho capitalism here, dismantle the modern welfare state based and drastically minimize or eliminate government intervention in both the economy and personal lives. 01:16:55:05 - 01:17:31:10 Speaker 3 So it's not quite anarchist. but it's pretty based. So it's going to be right up that, because it's, it's basically saying whatever the state, these are basically the same thing. So basically interchangeable social conservatism. let's look up social conservatism, political ideology, focus on preserving traditional moral values, establish social structures and cultural heritage frequently rooted in religious beliefs, and emphasizes the nuclear family, patriotism and social order over rapid societal change and or more moral relativism. 01:17:31:10 - 01:17:45:17 Speaker 3 So any it's got some based conclusions. 01:17:45:22 - 01:17:55:49 Speaker 3 established. Yeah. That's basically just like classical right wing ism in general. 01:18:00:29 - 01:18:30:26 Speaker 3 Probably down here with, neo conservatism, probably just around down there, social democracy. Social democracy is shit. but it may not be as shit as some of these other ones. Any anarchy is automatically better than social democracy. 01:18:30:31 - 01:18:44:52 Speaker 3 It's probably going to go right alongside democratic socialism, because democratic socialism is just we vote in, the, 01:18:44:57 - 01:19:16:04 Speaker 3 The fringe and social social democracy is just like we don't vote in the cringe because there's no, no, like, heavy authoritarianism. But it's it's a thought. It's red. It belongs in FDR. Let's be real social liberalism. it's yellow and it's got an old guy on it. So it's got to be pretty good. individual liberty and free market capitalism with government intervention to ensure equal opportunity, social justice and basic standard of living. 01:19:16:09 - 01:19:26:21 Speaker 3 That's kind of shit. that's actually worse. Wait a minute. 01:19:26:26 - 01:19:59:05 Speaker 3 Wait a minute. Monica ism belongs to belongs higher than that. Monica is automatically, better than this because it's got, oh. Oh, that's difficult. I just realized, like you, you need to put Monica some higher than any democracy. And, a lot of these are democracies, so that's actually rough. anyway, so we've got, free market capitalism, but the government fucks around with shit. 01:19:59:10 - 01:20:11:05 Speaker 3 that's basically just like Democrats, American, politics in a nutshell. 01:20:11:10 - 01:20:20:12 Speaker 3 Probably right below the, 01:20:20:17 - 01:20:25:40 Speaker 3 Yeah, yeah, something like that. 01:20:25:45 - 01:20:37:45 Speaker 3 Because it's got social in the, in, the name, it's got to be pretty low Stalinism. It's got to be right down at the bottom. 01:20:37:50 - 01:20:53:41 Speaker 3 Strasser ism. Definitely going to be right down at the bottom. It's the bloody, the law of the jungle ethic. It's like just irrational egoism. 01:20:53:46 - 01:21:27:06 Speaker 3 But is it as racist as the others? That's the question. Strasser ism. dissident, far right ideology based on Nazi ism. ultra nationalism, anti-capitalist, socialist leaning economic policies, policies. That's pretty shit. originating in the 1920s Nazi party, socialist nationalism. And it's a magic economic view. Opposition to Hitler, 1934 purge. Probably died in the, long night of the knives. 01:21:27:11 - 01:21:34:31 Speaker 3 So it's, 01:21:34:36 - 01:21:53:48 Speaker 3 Yeah. It's just just right that there are long names, balls. Right down that. Except it's more racist, so it belongs a little bit lower. So there we go. 01:21:53:53 - 01:22:17:59 Speaker 3 I believe we should all be turned into furries because they're cute. I reckon if you do that without consent, then you've committed a crime. And you should be, treated like a criminal. Should. Sure. I was happy for a time, but I'm law. Laurel. Loyal to philtrum based philtrum. I it's a Straus. Or it's basically. 01:22:18:04 - 01:22:52:51 Speaker 3 I understand what you're saying. My brain is growing. The universe is irrational. no. The universe is the means by which by which rationality can exist. And by by which, rationality does it for which rationality exists, I think. Right. It hates the color red. True lies. Monarchies are better than democracy. because the monarch is incentivized to, to lead the greatest legacy that he can. 01:22:52:55 - 01:23:18:28 Speaker 3 So if he does a shit job, then he's remembered as the one who did a shit job. and he's going to be in power for his entire life, so he doesn't have to worry about, it's not a de civilizing tendency. That's actually part of the reason why all of the all of Western civilization came from what effectively were absolute monarchies at some point in time. 01:23:18:33 - 01:23:33:04 Speaker 3 It's it's, it's a civilizing, nature because, like, you've got it and it is irrational and it's not good. and it's unjust in many ways as well, but it's at least not. 01:23:37:32 - 01:24:07:34 Speaker 3 Okay. So, in a democracy, especially one with high term limits, the person who's in charge is not going to be in charge for a very long time. and so they're incentivized to fair market to the society to gain as many votes as they possibly can. Because it doesn't matter. Doesn't matter. what is true? All that matters is what people think about it, because that's, you know, the major flaw in, in democracy, from the get go was that people don't know shit. 01:24:07:39 - 01:24:34:15 Speaker 3 and people can people can, be misled into thinking they know shit when they actually don't. and so they'll they'll vote based off of the shit that they don't know, rather than the shit that they do know. there's no, respect for competence in it. There's, only respect for the, the anybody who appears to be competent enough or or in the very least, more competent than the other guy. 01:24:34:19 - 01:24:56:26 Speaker 3 so that means that you can get away with just being a fake. And that's why politicians all appear to be fake, is because it's built into the system inherently, inherently. You've got loads of people who are incompetent, but they've got to pretend as if they are competent. And so you've got the people who pretend the best, or also who, who bullshit the best. 01:24:56:26 - 01:25:38:51 Speaker 3 Who, who, promise all the free shit the best. Right. and they're the ones who win, and they're only going to be there for a little while. They're going to be working as hard as they possibly can to, to make this system, to bend the system towards what they reckon it ought to be. and what what that means is that you're going to have, increasingly more authoritarian, governance, and, and leaders, whereas, if you, if you're going to have a leader, the, the least you can do is have a leader who's going to become decreasingly, authoritarian. 01:25:39:02 - 01:26:00:52 Speaker 3 And that's what you get in the case of monarchies. And, like a little bit of a tidbit here, in, in draconian society, you know, we had a fair bit of tyrannies and, we originally had loads of tribes and then they all united under a single, tyranny. And that was a bloody disaster. Literally a bloody disaster. 01:26:00:52 - 01:26:22:24 Speaker 3 Loads of people died. Right. so then we had, the next regime, effectively it was a feudal. It's teriyaki. It's what it's called. it's not really a term it's ever existed, but it's because, rather than having a, you know, tribal queens all over the place, which is which is how it was before, there was a tyranny. 01:26:22:28 - 01:26:49:07 Speaker 3 you had, one single king and queen ruling together, and it was primarily queen because it's a it's a matriarchal society. Right. and the two of them are ruling together, which is like, you know, radical, radical shit already. in comparison to what came before, and also, dragons are immortal, if you didn't know. so they live forever. 01:26:49:12 - 01:27:11:30 Speaker 3 unless they are killed as a, you know, basically, what immortal means. so. They. Because they live forever. There's an incredible stability in there because you're looking forward into the future as far as you possibly can. and so the entire thing is like, okay, we need this, this society to be as absolutely stable as it can possibly be. 01:27:11:40 - 01:27:20:00 Speaker 3 And part of the way that we do that, is. 01:27:20:04 - 01:27:56:03 Speaker 3 Well, so it began as a federated, absolute, story Archy, which is like, again, not really a term you've ever heard before, but it eventually, dissolved a bit, where rather than, this federated, because it was a, I think maybe it originally it was, it was a, Defined as a federated monarchy. but like, that was a transitioning period where it's like, okay, now the king actually can do things, to the same level as the Queen. 01:27:56:03 - 01:28:21:19 Speaker 3 And rather than a bunch of tribal queens and a lot of the tribal queens remained on, within the, the feudal system, as like nobles, you know, because that's how feudalism tends to work. but they, they went from thereon, and, you know, just, 01:28:21:24 - 01:28:51:44 Speaker 3 What is it? You've got all of these people who are kind of in it for the long run. there's there's still like sort of the element that the state is, You know, absolute in many ways. So, like, that's, that's a difficult sort of thing to grow out of. But, the draconian society is, is very apt towards, anarcho capitalism, because of the way that our genetic, structure works. 01:28:51:49 - 01:29:11:10 Speaker 3 there's a lot of sharing going on, let's say. So, eventually, in the same way that that genes breed, and are shared ideas breed and are shared and, you know, I think, when you when you begin decentralizing things, you end up, getting a lot closer to this total decentralized, what is it? 01:29:11:10 - 01:29:34:51 Speaker 3 Consent based ethic. So anyway, bit of a bit of a tangent there, but what is Zootopia? Zootopia is like bloody centrism right here. Probably some the more along the lines of social liberalism, where they, where they steal things from people for, equality sake. but it's it's somewhere in here, violation warning. I already saw that. 01:29:37:39 - 01:30:05:10 Speaker 3 It's somewhere. So it's a democracy, but it's probably somewhere around here. Buddy. Obama's Zootopia, right? Somewhere over in that zone. they've got a pretty decent amount of free market shite, but they've got a state clearly. it's actually kind of interesting because you don't hear much about, outside of Zootopia. You don't really hear much about, the, the state that they live under. 01:30:05:10 - 01:30:19:58 Speaker 3 They've got a city, and, you know, it's it's governance on the city level. so it's, it's either that they live in some sort of a, what do you call it, some sort of a, 01:30:20:03 - 01:30:22:22 Speaker 2 Republic, probably bubble. 01:30:22:27 - 01:30:41:23 Speaker 3 State that has, something like like the United States of America. Right? the fed or Federalist system, probably, But, yeah. Anyway, was it like that when a, wait. 01:30:41:28 - 01:31:14:14 Speaker 3 What if the monarch is evil? Well, that's part of the issue. But even if the monarch is evil, then you know, his, his rule is incredibly unstable, like, the the bloody, a pox on the phony king of England, right? Like you, you haven't got, a stable. like, this is a very anthropologically true thing is like when you've got a tyrant, you know, tyrannies, you know, the law of the jungle, the brute ethic is, is not stable. 01:31:14:19 - 01:31:35:33 Speaker 3 Your entire society is going to rebel against you and you. Then you'll be remembered as the shit one, right? so you can violate, people's rights in the interim. but it's going to, renowned against your benefit. in the end, especially if you were really kind of supposed to have a, a low time preference. 01:31:35:33 - 01:31:58:11 Speaker 3 And that's that's the beauty of monarchies, is that it actually, incites a lot. InCites it's it's a civilizing tendency because it, encourages a high, a low time preferences, whereas a democracy is a civilizing tendency because it, encourages a low time, a high time preference. So, 01:31:58:16 - 01:32:27:43 Speaker 3 Bro lived in Paris? no paper pirate hierarchy. I still don't know how to say it. Diarrhea. Was it like that when Abe Lincoln was president? Yes, absolutely. The exact same issue was was that I mean, Abe Lincoln was an incredibly, authoritarian president. It's just he did it on the idea that, that, individualism is important and anti, anti-slavery, anti collectivism was, was a good thing. 01:32:27:43 - 01:32:37:56 Speaker 3 So it was kind of mixed because he used the state in order to do that. Earth. 01:32:38:01 - 01:33:06:15 Speaker 3 Take me to Dragon land reign I want to see all the dragon milks. Why? Anyway, synthesis anarchism. Let's move on. Synthesis. And because, is, The anarchists. This is also the simply as the synthesis of, by its earlier name. United anarchism is an organizational principle that seeks unity in diversity. That's interesting. 01:33:06:20 - 01:33:28:04 Speaker 3 aiming to bring together anarchists of different tendencies into a single federation, developed and mainly by the Russian anarchist Volland and the French anarchist Sebastian File, this anarchist synthesis was designed to appeal to communist, syndicalist and individualist alike. 01:33:28:09 - 01:33:33:50 Speaker 3 It's. Yeah, yeah, yeah, because it's like, 01:33:33:55 - 01:34:10:10 Speaker 3 Gotta put it like, right up next to. It's kind of interesting. Like to be putting it next to Monica's, because it's because it's basically just anarchism. but it's like, okay, everyone who doesn't want rulers, you can do that. but only if you're in consenting, syndicates or communes or whatever. There's, you know, no, like, you can you can violate rights insofar as it's within a consenting agreement. 01:34:10:10 - 01:34:36:52 Speaker 3 I guess it's like, as long as everybody agrees to leave each other alone within their own, groups, then. Then you. Cool. Which is, it's a good, good principle, inherently, because it's just is basically just anti statism. whereas these guys are like, I don't like the state, but I also don't like anybody who, is remotely successful. 01:34:36:52 - 01:34:45:06 Speaker 3 And I wish that they would die. It's, it's it's anti 01:34:45:11 - 01:35:09:40 Speaker 3 It's anti-government but it's also anti hierarchy per se. And that's why it's anti-government. Just because the government is a hierarchy it's like anti hierarchy per se. which is not correct. It's like anti rulers. it's just depending on what you define a ruler to be. You may end up in this category, the orange category. But the base category belongs up here. 01:35:09:45 - 01:35:21:04 Speaker 3 third way. I forget that it's got Clinton and whoever the hell. 01:35:21:09 - 01:35:55:02 Speaker 3 Predominantly centrist political position that attempts to reconcile center right and center left, politics by synthesizing a combination of economically liberal and socially democratic economic policies. Bill Clinton, do I know him? Tony Blair I don't know him. Zhong city and Gerard Schluter yeah, that's pretty shit. probably right up alongside centrism. 01:35:55:07 - 01:36:02:46 Speaker 3 Yeah, yeah, probably something like that. Tito was 01:36:02:51 - 01:36:08:00 Speaker 3 Tito was the, 01:36:08:04 - 01:36:20:28 Speaker 3 Yugoslavia. is is a kami. Why was he bad? 01:36:20:33 - 01:36:48:24 Speaker 3 Okay, yeah. It's largely. Yeah. Socialist workers self-management, political separation from the Soviet Union leadership with a nonaligned movement were not aligned. Which is why we were together making a movement. Why they call it that. Yes, yes. Tito ism as a separate ideological line does not exist should Tito is and become an ideological line. We would become revisionists. 01:36:48:29 - 01:37:18:58 Speaker 3 We would have renounced Marxism. We are Marxist. I am a Marxist and therefore I cannot be a Tito ist. so it's just a it's just another flavor of commie cool. You belong at the very bottom. no, not as bad though, because he didn't kill as many people have Trotskyism. So Trotsky is like Marxism. It's Trotsky is evangelical Marxism. 01:37:19:03 - 01:37:49:43 Speaker 3 It's literally, we we must, Marxism is correct and therefore we must spread it. so we have to evangelize everybody into Marxism, you know, worldwide global Marxism, spread it about everywhere. And it's kind of funny because, like, communism is supposedly a stateless, classless society, and that's what anarcho communism is. But it's like Marx. Marx wasn't really an an anarchist. 01:37:49:48 - 01:38:09:05 Speaker 3 Not really. Like, I don't know, it's kind of interesting to think about. Anyway. Trotsky is literally just Marx, except he wants to spread it around the world. That makes it difficult. He did. He he got BTF. Oh. 01:38:09:06 - 01:38:12:22 Speaker 2 So didn't have the chance to do much. 01:38:12:27 - 01:38:27:04 Speaker 3 There we are. We've done it all. That's that's a bloody lot. That's a lot of it. But, that's that's basically it. Like, that's that's pretty good. I think that's pretty succinct. Individualism based. 01:38:30:16 - 01:38:50:37 Speaker 3 Hierarchy. you know, based insofar as we're talking about competence and, a consensual affair, though, you know, obviously there's things it's like I didn't could said to you be better at this league than me, like, okay. Yeah, you know, what you could do in that situation is cry about it. Actually. 01:38:50:42 - 01:39:02:30 Speaker 3 Blood. They probably have huge boobs and butts. Dragon Mills, huge boobs and butts. Interesting. I'll let you think that. And a wise and old. 01:39:03:04 - 01:39:27:20 Speaker 3 That's interesting. I don't know why you'd want that. And warm and cuddly, if you see me as that. If they see me as their treasure and they. They see me as theirs and will protect me and hug me all night. you missed Kirk ism. Charlie Kirk is, Charlie Kirk is like, like paleo Khan. let's look at this. 01:39:27:20 - 01:39:38:54 Speaker 3 Charlie Kirk is, He's not Bush. He's not Ron Paul. 01:39:38:58 - 01:40:09:28 Speaker 3 He he's probably just a little bit, further in this direction then, and maybe it's another no, no, no further in this direction than, than Ben Shapiro. So he's he's just right in there with, neo conservatism. probably it's probably around where he's at, though. There is not really any Kirk ism. That's not really a thing. 01:40:09:33 - 01:40:11:55 Speaker 3 Kirk ism. 01:40:17:57 - 01:40:26:25 Speaker 3 Yep yep yep yep. yeah. I mean, that's that's basically it, though. 01:40:26:30 - 01:40:32:30 Speaker 3 That's about all we need. 01:40:32:34 - 01:40:44:53 Speaker 3 I reckon, anyhow, I've got a Kirk. You got us. Don't do that. Don't do don't. 01:40:44:53 - 01:40:46:10 Speaker 2 Do don't do. 01:40:46:10 - 01:40:53:45 Speaker 3 That. 01:40:53:49 - 01:41:07:45 Speaker 3 yeah, I guess I don't. I don't think I have much to say. I'll probably put this up as a as a draconian discourse. I kind of hate putting him in the same ward, but, you know, it's whatever. 01:41:17:00 - 01:41:18:12 Speaker 2 That was pretty fun. 01:41:18:16 - 01:41:22:13 Speaker 3 Pretty fun indeed. It. 01:41:22:18 - 01:41:48:01 Speaker 3 But, yeah, I've. I've ran out of things to say as well. What is your, what is your verdict on this one? What do you reckon? You don't post on your edited video YouTube channel anymore? Yep. I have at the time. Haven't the time? The main channel is dead. the I don't know, yeah. How long have I gone without a. 01:41:48:06 - 01:42:19:36 Speaker 3 Well, not without posting, but without, Yeah, that's that's fucking incredible. It's been nearly two years. 2024 062 full Rainey's rambles scrambles been on my desktop for two fucking years. Pretty credible. because that's Rainey's Rambles. belongs on main channel. It kind of doesn't. But I mean, that's the thing is that even if it's not, like, fantastic content, it's still content. 01:42:19:36 - 01:42:37:39 Speaker 3 I'd love to get back into some of the ideas that I wanted to explore in, in, in video format, but but alas, you know, white girls. My favorite. What do you mean? Why is that? The first thing you mind goes to when you see that the wolf's the. 01:42:37:39 - 01:42:39:55 Speaker 2 Wolf, a wolf. 01:42:40:00 - 01:42:52:07 Speaker 3 And it's the bi fanboys and the gay fanboys have it a grand old time. It is a straight fanboys who hate themselves. It's pretty good. 01:42:52:12 - 01:43:05:43 Speaker 3 The the original thing that you said to this was, why are they all, anime girl ified and why do they have huge bananas or whatever? You said? 01:43:05:48 - 01:43:29:23 Speaker 3 What do you think of the content, though? The content of the character, the content of the meme? I made a meme along the same lines. I, you know, I actually never made that a meme of the day. Perhaps I would have if I, get Chris, would it be faster to go to my bloody DeviantArt where I post this? 01:43:29:28 - 01:43:33:06 Speaker 3 Yeah, let's do that. 01:43:33:11 - 01:43:37:19 Speaker 3 There it is, buddy. Laughing at the geriatric. 01:43:38:44 - 01:44:04:11 Speaker 3 Pretty good, pretty good. This was fun. This is like, when I was first, just barely. Well, no, I wasn't just barely learning blender. I was just, like, a couple months into, to working on blender full time. Working in blender full time. I was actually work on the application. These three are actually you, me and Mal grew. 01:44:04:16 - 01:44:09:28 Speaker 3 it's kind of true. That's got a true. 01:44:09:33 - 01:44:20:19 Speaker 3 I think straight fanboys have a bit of a tough time compared to the other two. Yes, an oppressed minority. Indeed. 01:44:20:24 - 01:44:39:01 Speaker 3 The least thought of. Yes. They also don't exist very much. That is to say that they're rare. 01:44:39:06 - 01:44:45:08 Speaker 3 But, 01:44:45:13 - 01:45:09:28 Speaker 3 Was I going to say, Yeah. I'd love to actually finish this video. It's kind of nuts to think that it's been, that long since I originally sanctioned it outside. let's actually check, when it shut up. What if Firefox. I didn't mean to click that. 01:45:09:33 - 01:45:21:44 Speaker 3 My channel. Let me see my channel. One year ago. Which means what? 01:45:21:49 - 01:45:49:54 Speaker 3 Was it exactly one year ago, or, Because I had split digressions over dessert that Rainey's rambles, in November 2024. March 2025. So only a year. Only just a year, which isn't so bad. So I guess I split it off. I split it off, quite a while ago, so it would seem I still have that video. 01:45:49:54 - 01:46:04:58 Speaker 3 Racial collectivism. Oh, wait. No, it's it's unlisted. I didn't realize it was unlisted. May 4th, 2020. Why did I unlock that one? 01:46:05:03 - 01:46:13:16 Speaker 3 I actually don't recall. That's interesting. 01:46:13:21 - 01:46:19:31 Speaker 3 This meme is the reverse King Ghidorah. What does that mean? 01:46:22:27 - 01:46:28:58 Speaker 3 I haven't watched this video in a long time. 01:46:29:03 - 01:46:37:52 Speaker 3 Okay. Yeah. So? So you'll be able to see just how different my voice is. If, like, a bear is, this is going to be very different. 01:46:37:57 - 01:46:45:46 Speaker 4 So about a month ago, I left a comment on a video called Black Conservatives Debate Black Liberals on American Politics. Extended version. One of the points many of these black conservatives won. 01:46:45:47 - 01:47:12:37 Speaker 3 This is just like it's so odd because my voice is so much deeper. But I was an adult back then, and I'm a adult. I'm a, you know, I'm an adult now. I don't know why my voice got so much deeper. Like, I don't know what happened. There's not much as change like this on a record. Much has changed. 01:47:12:42 - 01:47:43:36 Speaker 3 Yeah. What is King Ghidorah? King Ghidorah, I mean, two serious heads, one silly. Holy moly. Why, bro got that shit on? What happened to the jacket? it's in my closet. Now, I don't know, I actually don't know why I chose to retire. It. It's actually very interesting to think about, like. Yeah, I don't know. I like how the bitrate is just absolutely shite. 01:47:43:41 - 01:47:51:36 Speaker 4 Was that some amount to a large amount of the racism? The experience was at the hands of other black people telling them they weren't black enough due to their political opinions. I left this comment. 01:47:51:36 - 01:48:13:54 Speaker 3 You can oh my fucking profile picture is absolute shite. It the you're not black enough ideas. Mostly deaf, most definitely racist because it assumes that all black people must think exactly the same. So when any break break ranks, they no longer fulfill the requirements to truly be black. Why not let people think what they want and forget about race for a moment? 01:48:13:59 - 01:48:21:00 Speaker 3 The individualist point I didn't have I was not a principled individualist, but I. 01:48:21:04 - 01:48:31:42 Speaker 4 you did if you like. But the main point is that telling someone that they're not black enough for their political opinions is inherently racist, and that we should generally leave race out of the realm of debate. Remember that because I said so later I left. 01:48:31:46 - 01:48:40:31 Speaker 3 I'm wondering if I don't know because like the way that I pronounce, I pronounce good as words is like changed as well. 01:48:42:07 - 01:49:05:54 Speaker 3 Like like maybe it's just because I've, I've gotten, like more lazy or I don't know, but like, I was like a very pro and proper a very pleb and proper. But I'm also like stumbling because like, I'm like not terribly good at, like doing things I don't know. Throws in a wormhole. Scottish rain. What do you mean, it? 01:49:05:58 - 01:49:15:42 Speaker 3 There's nothing Scottish about what I'm saying. How do you wings go through it? whole. 01:49:15:47 - 01:49:31:59 Speaker 4 Not really thinking that many people would see it, which isn't generally a good mindset. Should only make comments for the purpose of people reading them. Otherwise you may end up saying something regrettable. The comment actually goes on pretty well. I got many people replying in hearty agreement. Many who disagreed or otherwise wanted to have some sort of debate a discussion, and I'd like to talk a little about that today. 01:49:31:59 - 01:49:33:32 Speaker 4 One person really missed out a. 01:49:33:37 - 01:49:44:52 Speaker 3 Little about that today. It sounds better what I say today, because my voice is deep. And I'd like to add I'd like to talk a little bit about that today. Yeah. 01:49:44:57 - 01:49:46:58 Speaker 3 Why why did I sound like that? 01:49:47:03 - 01:50:03:52 Speaker 4 A comment I support Trump and I'm blacker than y'all. The point was to not tell other people that their racial identity is invalid due to their political opinions, right or left. Overall, it's not a very individualist thing to say. Another says it's wrong, but it's not racist. How can you be racist amongst your own people? It's excluding people and shutting out individualism. 01:50:03:52 - 01:50:14:53 Speaker 4 But it's not racist now. I think the definition of racism is lost on many people. There are many definitions, but I think I'll go with Merriam Webster's. Racism is a belief that race is the primary determinant of human drives, and that racial. 01:50:14:53 - 01:50:16:13 Speaker 3 Differences, this is. 01:50:16:18 - 01:50:19:00 Speaker 4 The priority of a particular race or simply. 01:50:19:00 - 01:50:23:51 Speaker 3 Particular race. The particular. But I don't even know how I'm pronouncing that. 01:50:23:55 - 01:50:31:42 Speaker 4 Right, and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race, particular race. 01:50:31:46 - 01:50:54:40 Speaker 3 Inherent superiority of a particular race. Other. There's like just the way that I said that was just very different from the way that I say the exact I don't know if I could I want to repeat that so badly. This makes me want to just end the TikTok stream. So I could say it. I don't want to get banned again and say bad words. 01:50:54:45 - 01:51:15:06 Speaker 3 I'm doing it. I'm ending the TikTok stream just so I could say it. Goodbye. TikTok forever. Fuck you. It's been to error occurred. What do you mean an error occurred? Did it end? 01:51:15:11 - 01:51:19:43 Speaker 3 I can't tell if it ended. Does it do something when? 01:51:19:48 - 01:51:21:04 Speaker 2 Hey. 01:51:21:09 - 01:51:24:17 Speaker 3 Wait a minute. 01:51:24:22 - 01:51:30:51 Speaker 3 Fagot. Right, okay, I said it. I don't know, I don't know if it's, get as. 01:51:30:56 - 01:51:40:05 Speaker 4 True. Differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race, or simply prejudice or discrimination based exclusively on race. I like this definition because it pretty much I. 01:51:40:19 - 01:52:04:18 Speaker 3 I've seen because I think maybe I was just sloppier than maybe I was like, I don't know, because the the way that I pronounced things just gets like garbled by whatever's in my mind at the time. So maybe it's because I was like watching a lot of Pyrocynical at the time. because, like, he, he uses the, the soft, soft t stop. 01:52:04:18 - 01:52:20:12 Speaker 3 I forget what you call it. There's a word, for that, but it's like like when you go, Like when you go, fagot. Right? Rather than fagot. And I prefer. I prefer the latter, but I did, simply. 01:52:20:12 - 01:52:23:57 Speaker 4 Prejudice or discrimination based exclusively on race. I like this definition. 01:52:23:57 - 01:52:40:43 Speaker 3 Because I like this definition. I like this definition. I don't say that it's not a thing that I say, I think I, I, I must have been listening to like, Pyrocynical or something, which just like, no, no, you're like, you've been infected by the bad acts and they'll do it. 01:52:40:48 - 01:52:58:34 Speaker 4 Pretty much covers all bases. So yeah, saying that black people can't have certain political opinions is racist, no matter the race of who says it, because that statement discriminates purely because of race. I think there's a spectrum even in the replies in this comment section, there are reasonable, intelligent people on the right. In the left, just the same, there are unreasonable people on both sides. 01:52:58:34 - 01:53:01:03 Speaker 4 And then there were stupid people. Someone leaves too. 01:53:01:03 - 01:53:30:34 Speaker 3 It's kind of funny. I just don't even believe that at all anymore. Like, maybe I was, at the other because I was more aligned with, like, conservatism. I think at this point in time, American conservatism in particular, I had a bit of about that, like a very patriotic little, little bit that and I think it's just because, like, individualism is kind of the basis of America in many ways. 01:53:30:34 - 01:53:44:48 Speaker 3 But like, it wasn't for any principled reason necessarily. well, I don't know, maybe it was principle, but I didn't understand the principles. I hadn't integrated them. And I, you know. 01:53:44:53 - 01:54:00:22 Speaker 3 You are what you consume. I consume fagots, apparently. And no, I could sue pyro. I could sue fat fetishists, evidently. Now you have the Obi Wan accent. Apparently. I don't know. 01:54:00:22 - 01:54:02:39 Speaker 4 Evidently Executive Commons. 01:54:02:44 - 01:54:25:32 Speaker 3 Does like the. I definitely don't believe that at all. Like, I don't think there are reasonable people on the left because I'm an extremist now. Like. I don't know, I mean, Rand has a good, good bit on, on extremism, but it's it's like I take a principled stance, if that's what you call extremism, then, like your nonsense. 01:54:25:32 - 01:54:53:10 Speaker 3 You know your nonsense. But, like, yeah, I definitely don't believe that there are, like, reasonable people on the right of the left. I think, I think I like the principle I was embracing with reasonableness was, one of, like, I don't know, this, this upscaler from, what is it called? The, the, that, After Effects. 01:54:53:10 - 01:55:06:53 Speaker 3 This upscaler is total totally bad. I am reasonable, I can reason with you. That doesn't make you reasonable. The ability to speak does not make you intelligent. 01:55:06:58 - 01:55:23:24 Speaker 4 it's not racism. It's colorism. It's not racism. It's prejudice. Just as a definition of the term states, prejudice based on race is indeed racism. I fail to see how people conclude that racism isn't a certain type of prejudice, and a very nasty one at that. So you've got the spectrum of intelligent, unreasonable and stupid people on either side. 01:55:23:24 - 01:55:32:48 Speaker 4 This bloke I'm about to talk about is none of those things. He's the bottom of brain meme. He's absolutely ascended. He's on another plane of existence, as many people do. 01:55:32:55 - 01:55:54:26 Speaker 3 I feel like, you know, I may have actually thought that this delivery was, like, decent back in the day. I think I'm I may recall having a good, good time making this. I did not make this one in, in in resolve this one. One does. This one was definitely in premiere. Bloke. Yeah. I don't really say that anymore. 01:55:54:31 - 01:56:15:55 Speaker 3 Wait a minute. I actually watched this video. I remember this now. You did. You really? Oh, didn't like long time ago because it would have been public at the time. Let's see if you're in the comments. This is the unlisted link. So you could you could look it up if you really wanted to. It in where were you with the Logic Pod podcast dropped? 01:56:16:00 - 01:56:18:08 Speaker 3 That was fun. 01:56:22:57 - 01:56:32:55 Speaker 3 Though. Yeah. DJ, I remember DJ if you look on my very first YouTube streams, he's he's on that. 01:56:33:00 - 01:56:54:09 Speaker 3 Yeah, I guess I guess you were to the comments, but, I maybe you never, never saw like I, I swear, I thought I remember seeing you in comments, but maybe it was just like seeing you in the comments section. I'm probably just remembering you on the like the Ford Archive Channel. I mean, like recently ish, when I first started watching you, they weren't up. 01:56:54:09 - 01:57:00:10 Speaker 3 Then, like they didn't exist. 01:57:00:15 - 01:57:27:47 Speaker 3 Like, it was unlisted. It was down. It still is. what do you mean, cap? I took it down in, like, bloody 2023 is of, like, there's no cap about that. I'm calling it. What do you mean? This is all that I had up on this? Like, I may talk about some related things in these videos. Goodness. 01:57:27:47 - 01:58:02:05 Speaker 3 Why is it the, like, quality of these, these thumbnails? It's like, so shite white like. Just jpeg compression. The sub shite. Why did they blow up the thumbnails that, like, limit the size thereof? That's so bad looking, but I can't tell if they're compressed or low, like just low quality. It's kind of shite. You can see the rainy end in the background that, well, it's hard when you could see the thing. 01:58:02:10 - 01:58:12:26 Speaker 3 I remember the ascended bit. No, this can't be. Really, I don't know. That's interesting. If you if you actually ended up seeing it at some point. 01:58:12:31 - 01:58:20:32 Speaker 4 Able to see that racism is a type of prejudice, but also doesn't want to call it racism, here's the call back I set up earlier. Isn't that just a prejudiced. 01:58:20:37 - 01:58:44:10 Speaker 3 Racist bias to prejudice? What is attitude and all spirit? Why do we not end this racism thing and look at it as I do, being at all our human beings? Can we simply say some have biased perceptions and feelings, moral ethical dissonance regarding things in general? Oh right. Yeah, yeah, that's a that's a terrible point. Like it's called racism because they're, discriminating based off of race. 01:58:44:15 - 01:59:01:37 Speaker 3 Like being not not necessarily being biased, but being prejudiced or like it's like, well, why can't we ditch the racism thing? Because it's like an important categorical distinction. It's what they're discriminating based off of. Like is it important? Categories distinction but also. 01:59:01:37 - 01:59:16:55 Speaker 4 Doesn't want to call it racism. Here's the callback I set up earlier. Isn't that just a YouTuber thing to do? Anyway, I find it funny that he says, why do we not end this racism thing? When I ended my initial comment by suggesting that we leave race out of it, I reckon there's an imbalance in the political sphere that we have in. 01:59:16:55 - 01:59:25:01 Speaker 3 Our political sphere. I don't know, I don't know, like I can't mimic it, but it's just not the way that I. 01:59:25:01 - 01:59:40:54 Speaker 4 Speak saying that we leave race out of it. I reckon there's an imbalance in the political sphere leading up to find common ground on the ones on the left. Many see it prudent to call absolutely everything racist, when in reality there's a much better conclusion to be made. And we should simply apply Occam's razor because the left decides to behave like this. 01:59:40:54 - 01:59:42:15 Speaker 4 There's some pushback on the right. 01:59:42:15 - 01:59:51:01 Speaker 3 Yeah. That's me. I've been applying Occam's Razor since 2020. Or or before been use that a lot. 01:59:52:27 - 02:00:03:42 Speaker 3 I think you looked at this video on another video of yours. Maybe I did, maybe I did at some point or another. I'm gonna end this racism thing. 02:00:03:47 - 02:00:07:34 Speaker 4 Do it where we hesitate to admit that something is racist when it absolutely is. 02:00:07:34 - 02:00:20:12 Speaker 3 Oh, you know, it may have been on a on a discord call or something like, I may have pulled it up on, no, no, no, no, I like because I had it up in like premiere or something like that. I may have been on a stream, I don't know. 02:00:20:17 - 02:00:31:15 Speaker 4 Everything is racist, but some things on your agenda shouldn't supersede your willingness to call out injustice if it exists, so long as your intent is to maintain egalitarianism, which many people are unwilling to embrace anyway. I only wish. 02:00:31:16 - 02:01:01:10 Speaker 3 I was okay with egalitarianism. I was okay with that. Now I don't give a shit. It egalitarianism? In what sense? Because I think back then I actually, assumed that egalitarianism meant like, like just negative rights. Like equal rights. And it's just like, oh yeah, equality before the law type of shit. But I think I just, I didn't understand that it, it has like, collectivist premises in it. 02:01:01:10 - 02:01:19:36 Speaker 3 It's like it's about equality of outcome, not about equality of opportunity. Very different things and not not equality of an opportunity of opportunity in the sense that, like, you ought to be given shite, you know, I just I just don't think I understood that. Anyway. 02:01:19:41 - 02:01:38:17 Speaker 4 I do one reply which states not having a collective identity hurts us, a point with which I vehemently disagree, but in the same breath implies that nobody should believe me because I'm white. I don't know where people get the idea that I'm white, despite the fact I'm obviously purple. You know seriousness, it's true black. But the sentiments expressed in my comments are reflected by some black people. 02:01:38:21 - 02:01:40:58 Speaker 4 Simply read the replies and you'll see that. 02:01:41:03 - 02:02:06:55 Speaker 3 Well, it is actually kind of funny that someone would assume that based on what I'm saying there, that I'm white and based off of absolutely nothing else. That's like like that's odd. That's actually very odd because like, the entire point that I was making is that like, hey, people who disagree, people who don't have like people who disagree with you when you say that having a collective identity hurts us. 02:02:07:00 - 02:02:29:12 Speaker 3 the people who disagree with that can also be black, but he assumes that it I don't know, that's just collective collectivism in and of itself is that the the individual is, fundamentally powerless without the group, and thus individual should only form groups, and individuals are only useful insofar as they can form groups, and then they can go around beating people. 02:02:29:17 - 02:02:33:57 Speaker 3 It's like, great, what a great fucking philosophy. 02:02:34:01 - 02:02:48:45 Speaker 4 But there are some black people who agree with me. This comment is very telling because it shows that collectivism pits groups against each other. Assuming that I'm white because I said something individualist is the exact problem that I was calling out in my original comment. This person assumes that a true black person would never think something like that, which is. 02:02:48:45 - 02:03:12:57 Speaker 3 But yeah, it's I mean, I don't even have to point it out because I already pointed it out six years ago. Evidently. That hoodie is not reaching your head, that it's not supposed to necessarily. I had quite the neck at that point. You see that? Well, I actually, was not bipedal at this point in time, which is very interesting. 02:03:13:01 - 02:03:24:55 Speaker 4 Racist and a logical fallacy. We like to call no true Scotsman a word to the wise. Don't let your racial identity overtake your ability to perceive that other people might think differently than you, or people of your race. To wrap it up, no. 02:03:25:00 - 02:03:25:28 Speaker 3 Audio. 02:03:25:28 - 02:03:45:27 Speaker 4 Shiting leaves another blessed reply. I haven't the foggiest whether he was directing this at me or to the world at large, but he writes, you need a more sound mental construct and then proceeds to link several Wikipedia articles. Now I like me a good Wikipedia read, but I don't think a person with a quote sound mental construct would write such a thing and reply to a stranger on the internet, but to each their own. 02:03:45:27 - 02:03:48:16 Speaker 4 Overall, I mental construct would write such. 02:03:48:16 - 02:04:25:22 Speaker 3 That the blind leading the blind straight to the pits of hell. If you want to understand life in reality, you need a more advanced thinking and observation skill as it people. People just like make up words, don't they? You need a more advanced thinking and observation skill. What does this mean? White. Why are any of these words used in in relation to each other like it's like they're just throwing out words that generally have to do with the flavor of what they're saying, rather than actually using words that say specifically what they intend to communicate. 02:04:25:27 - 02:04:59:12 Speaker 3 It's like you need a more advanced method of thinking, and your observation skills require, sprucing up like improvement, you know, like, what does all these words like, combined together? It's just like, generally the idea of what you're trying to say is there, but it's not concretized at all. A more sound mental construct. You must love to think in order for your intelligence and spiritual maturity to increase. 02:04:59:17 - 02:05:13:24 Speaker 3 This is very odd. This is like a very high openness person. but but low conscientiousness, it seems the metaphysics of causation, intuitions and the metaphysics of causation. 02:05:14:08 - 02:05:33:30 Speaker 3 Plato, he's he's referring bladed as a he's referring to bladed as a bit. So over primacy of consciousness, he's all about the primacy of consciousness. It's over. These are written. It's over. I hope I'm not still streaming on a TikTok. 02:05:33:34 - 02:05:55:00 Speaker 3 Mock. Apply a neck. Yes, precisely. Buzzword. Buzzword. Buzzword. Perhaps English isn't their first language. No, no, I that it doesn't strike me as that. It strikes me as if they just say words is there's people whose first language is English and they just say words. They don't string them together well, they just say the words that are generally in the ballpark of what they're trying to communicate. 02:05:55:14 - 02:05:57:01 Speaker 3 But at least so many funny things. 02:05:57:06 - 02:06:04:49 Speaker 4 Will sound mental construct and then proceeds to link several Wikipedia articles. Now I like me a good sound mental construct. Okay. 02:06:04:54 - 02:06:13:31 Speaker 3 Now got suspended. Fuck. I meant to end the fucking stream. Why the fuck did you do that? 02:06:15:43 - 02:06:25:43 Speaker 3 Why? Why did it just ever out on a on fucking restream? If I reload Restream bullet actually say that I ended the stream. No, it won't. 02:06:26:35 - 02:06:33:03 Speaker 3 It says that it's still streaming. What the fuck? 02:06:33:07 - 02:06:53:21 Speaker 3 He said a two syllable word. Metaphysic of causation. Intuitions. In the metaphysics of causation, correlation does not imply causality. Causation. Correlation, fallacy. Illusion. What does this have to do with? I said, semantic whole is a biased perceptual assumption only leads to hell. 02:06:53:26 - 02:06:56:00 Speaker 3 This person needs some Jordan Peterson. 02:06:56:04 - 02:06:57:13 Speaker 2 And. 02:06:57:18 - 02:07:13:43 Speaker 3 Educated is what in one thing is one thing. Being wise and all of the in of all sciences is quite another. Wisdom is King. Now is this person need some some, some Peterson? Pete Jordan Peterson is life. Wisdom is life. Refuge. 02:07:13:54 - 02:07:30:20 Speaker 4 Now, I like me a good Wikipedia read, but yeah, but to each their own. Overall, I think stable people generally don't let the comments of strangers get to them, but I reckon he just wanted to help someone he thought was misguided. And for that I can't blame him or her or it. I don't know, do I? I hope you enjoyed this fun little fireside discussion. 02:07:30:20 - 02:07:36:15 Speaker 4 Yes. I don't leave the door open on your way out. You could let in a draft, and I really want to keep it cozy around here. Cheerio. 02:07:36:20 - 02:07:54:27 Speaker 3 Let's. I said so shed. I sound so fucking shit. Now, that was bad. Oh, wait, there's a there's a post. There's a credits. Younger right is cheeky. Yeah a little bit. But it's so. 02:07:54:27 - 02:08:16:54 Speaker 4 Loud. Goodness. Never let me say cheerio again unless I'm referring to the breakfast cereal. Anyway, I may eventually finish the video I've been working on since. Goodness, November might just scrap it or rewrite it, but we'll see. I don't know if I'm busy or just lazy. Probably both. I think I'm getting better at recording. I used to put my face up too close to the mic and have the gain up too loud, but I think this is good and it's some now, so I might keep doing that. 02:08:16:54 - 02:08:18:04 Speaker 4 Or doing strangers. I don't. 02:08:18:04 - 02:08:18:47 Speaker 3 Like myself. 02:08:18:47 - 02:08:21:15 Speaker 2 So yeah. 02:08:21:20 - 02:08:26:54 Speaker 4 Who do you think you are lagging about? I go back to your hentai or whatever you do. 02:08:26:58 - 02:08:31:38 Speaker 2 Okay? It's just a few, okay? 02:08:31:43 - 02:08:39:53 Speaker 3 It is like, what a happy, optimistic lad. While I'm recording. 02:08:39:58 - 02:08:47:44 Speaker 3 Oh, that was Adrian's voice, by the way. I used to have Adrian's voice set as my ringtone, and it's just it was from a Snapchat video of him saying. 02:08:47:53 - 02:08:48:42 Speaker 2 Fish. 02:08:48:46 - 02:08:51:55 Speaker 3 For some reason. I don't know why you said that. 02:08:52:00 - 02:08:53:59 Speaker 2 Fish. 02:08:54:04 - 02:09:03:33 Speaker 3 It's actually pretty, pretty forceful. pretty forceful ringtone that. 02:09:03:38 - 02:09:25:00 Speaker 3 Yeah, yeah, a little bit cheeky. I don't know why. Yeah. See, now it says unable to connect. I meant to fucking end it before. Like, I think it actually has to, has to receive the end stream signal, like the end stream frame or whatever it is. And then I have to. So in order to end the TikTok stream, I have to end both, which is like just retarded. 02:09:25:05 - 02:09:43:43 Speaker 3 but I can say it now because I know that it's done. I don't didn't mean to do that because, like, they could actually put another fucking strike on my stupid account. I meant to end the stream, but you decided to be fucking stupid. I should have said it again without actually verifying that it was. It wasn't live. 02:09:43:52 - 02:09:54:26 Speaker 3 I had a feeling that might have happened. Bullshit. Yeah, that was interesting. Yeah, that was an interesting time. 02:09:54:31 - 02:10:11:01 Speaker 3 I remember, thinking up that, like, hentai line of, I don't know, I said, like, why did I say that? Like, I thought it was just funny. I think I was just riffing like I was like, oh, this would be kind of funny if I said this. 02:10:11:06 - 02:10:35:28 Speaker 3 I had it. I had a very different idea of how to perform at the time. It's kind of interesting. TikTok, more like Dick, but true riffing and rapping. Oh yeah, that was loads of rapping, so much riffing, so much rapping, loads of it, loads of it. since November. 02:10:35:33 - 02:11:07:25 Speaker 3 It wasn't that one. Which one was it? But something that got shelved. I was probably yeah, I was definitely referring to something that got shelved because, right after that one, I, I did like a 4th of July video, just impromptu, and then I did, and then I didn't do anything else for, for three years on that channel. 02:11:07:30 - 02:11:22:29 Speaker 3 So there was something else in between that, I don't know, I'm actually curious. I'm going to look into it. I'm going to see YouTube, old, 02:11:22:34 - 02:11:38:46 Speaker 3 Happy America day. yeah. That was the last video I did on in the old. That was the one that I'm pretty sure was actually. I want to see, 02:11:38:51 - 02:12:01:13 Speaker 3 There it is, project DB, because, it's not a DaVinci resolve. It's not. It's not a DRP. It's just, Yeah, yeah, that one was done in resolve. I don't even know if I could, I could get the editor and the editor of that if I tried. 02:12:01:18 - 02:12:22:02 Speaker 3 I shelved it, I, I definitely shelved it, but I don't remember. because I don't remember what I was actually working on at that point. 02:12:22:07 - 02:12:27:15 Speaker 3 wasn't that. 02:12:27:20 - 02:12:33:31 Speaker 3 What was I working on since November 2020? 02:12:33:36 - 02:12:38:23 Speaker 3 Oh, wait. No. November 2019. 02:12:38:28 - 02:12:47:50 Speaker 3 Yeah, it was after I did the trip vlog thing. What was it? 02:12:47:55 - 02:13:00:31 Speaker 3 I've got a folder here called, Film School Sucks. And wasn't that just true? As true as can be. 02:13:07:59 - 02:13:16:33 Speaker 3 November 2019. Let's see if there's anything in here. 02:13:16:37 - 02:13:30:51 Speaker 3 No. Yeah. I actually don't know what it was. What was I referring to? I could probably look at my screenshots. I could find that Dragon Ball. You know, ball. 02:13:34:52 - 02:13:59:57 Speaker 3 This is such a waste of time. I just had this dream as point. I've been going for four hours. I normally don't go for that long, you know. Ball? No. What do you mean, no? Am I not free yet? 20. 19. Oh. not. Oh. 11. 02:14:00:02 - 02:14:24:02 Speaker 3 What was I doing at the time? It's actually kind of crazy that I've got all of these records, because even if I haven't got, like, exactly what my system looked like at the time, I've got the screenshots I was still using, like that old Rs version of OneNote. I was I was on premiere 2017. I think. Maybe it was 2018 at that point. 02:14:24:02 - 02:14:34:47 Speaker 3 That was pretty nuts. That was when I first discovered rags. That's pretty neat. 02:14:34:52 - 02:14:55:29 Speaker 3 Wow, that was a different time, wasn't it? Very different time. This is entertaining. Entertain me. More slave rags. Okay, first of all, not just slave. Definitely not. 02:14:55:34 - 02:15:00:30 Speaker 3 Yeah. Rags. 02:15:00:34 - 02:15:13:54 Speaker 3 We love rags. There is. We can kind of see his thing there, but not really. Look, Maya, I was in shit program. Wasn't that fucking terrible? 02:15:13:59 - 02:15:46:33 Speaker 3 Yeah. We love we love rags. My bisexual awakening. Oh, shit. I was working, yeah, this was. This was college. Oh, it was the Billy Eyelash video. That's what it was. Yeah, that's what it was. That one got shelved. Yeah. I think I may have gone over that in, I definitely, like, pulled up the premiere project at some point afterwards. 02:15:46:37 - 02:16:12:35 Speaker 3 because I had made this observation that like around the exact same time I made, like, this scarily similar point, like almost word for word to, a similar point that Stephen Crowder made on, on the, on a podcast episode or it's show episode, whatever you call it. and it was like literally like right around the same time, exact same topic, exact same point down to the wording. 02:16:12:40 - 02:16:22:52 Speaker 3 I was like, that's incredibly spooky. How the hell did that happen? Like, I know, I thought, I thought that was pretty incredible. Pretty pretty odd. 02:16:22:57 - 02:16:34:31 Speaker 3 I know what kind of man you are. What do you mean, what? That sigma. What? What do you mean by this? Yes, it was a rant. I used to call it that. 02:16:34:36 - 02:16:48:10 Speaker 3 Yes. Rant canceled. And there's more of them in the canceled folder than there are in the original. 02:16:48:15 - 02:16:59:18 Speaker 3 Wait. No way. It was on. Wait, wait, it was the Wii U emulator. Oh, okay. So November 2020 is when I was doing the Billie Eilish video. 02:16:59:22 - 02:17:15:04 Speaker 3 It was on. It was on Simo. I was working on that. I was working on that a long time. And it's kind of remarkable because I just didn't even know how emulation worked. I didn't realize that I had had shite hardware. 02:17:15:09 - 02:17:40:47 Speaker 3 It's kind of funny. Stephen Crowder summoned his spirit into you. Yeah, I don't know. I don't know how I did that. You asked people to change your mind. Did it work? that's kind of funny that I just. It was just simple project, and it seemed. 2019 PR proj open that a couple of times. Yeah, yeah. So I ended up going. 02:17:40:52 - 02:17:47:45 Speaker 3 Oh. So I went back. 02:17:47:49 - 02:18:24:09 Speaker 3 By since November 1101. But these are modified. 928 2019 that's odd, but yeah, apparently I was working on that. Yeah, that was a time wasn't it? That was a time. Yeah. That Billie Eilish video was going to be so esthetically pleasing if I ever got around to finishing it, which of course I never do high industriousness. but, no, no Adderall and, very difficult to follow through on those, those things. 02:18:24:14 - 02:18:45:31 Speaker 3 It was difficult. Billie Eilish is hot. Yeah, but she's stupid. That's the thing. If you could fuck the stupid out of her, then maybe she's tolerable. But, I don't think you could do that. You can't fix it. Don't stick your dick crazy hot snow bunny. You only say that because she's, like, pasty white, and, she's got fat. 02:18:45:31 - 02:19:02:57 Speaker 3 It's like. That's the only reason you're saying that. What did she say? she said loads of retarded things over the years, but, actually, that's. I wonder if that's part of. Well, I just made a realization because I'm like, okay, I said retarded on Twitch. You can get banned for saying retarded on Twitch, right? But I've never done so. 02:19:02:57 - 02:19:17:37 Speaker 3 I've never gotten a warning so much as a warning from Twitch for saying it. And I'm wondering if it's because, like, I've never had a Twitch mod on my stream to hear me say before, but then I realized, wait a minute. So TikTok, uses AI to scrape their shit because like, immediately it's like, oh no, you said the bad word. 02:19:17:42 - 02:19:25:25 Speaker 3 Banham. Right? But, 02:19:25:30 - 02:19:29:43 Speaker 3 But bloody, 02:19:29:48 - 02:19:55:18 Speaker 3 What the fuck? I said, what the fuck? I said, what the fuck? I the fuck is it? What am I what am I thinking? All right, so they actually have the time for, like, AI models to be 24 seven scraping like they have the compute, the budget to have AI models constantly scraping, and auto moderating the content on their platform. 02:19:55:23 - 02:20:30:49 Speaker 3 The like, they've got the compute for that and they dedicated to that. I wonder if the reason why they could do that is because they gate keep the the live ability, like your ability to go live on TikTok is very difficult to actually get in, to be able to go live. It's probably because of that. It's probably because the constantly Tory voice over doing it, which is probably part of the reason why, mine is aren't allowed on it, is because they don't like there's some sort of legal problem with, using, computer systems to automatically store, and or like, do anything with minors. 02:20:30:54 - 02:20:44:21 Speaker 3 that's very interesting to think about. She is pretty, I don't know, she's got, like, weird bags under her eyes. She's all right. She's all right. 02:20:44:26 - 02:20:53:50 Speaker 3 Nothing against her. Nothing against her. Except for, retardation. Of course. 02:20:53:55 - 02:21:12:17 Speaker 3 Yeah, I just didn't even know, Yeah, I didn't know anything, so I'm glad the CMU video never came out. There were loads of things that if I'd released it, it would have just been like, oh, yeah, that was kind of retarded. Like, why? Why did you do that? 02:21:12:22 - 02:21:19:31 Speaker 3 What is innocent until proven guilty? All caps dot dot docs. 02:21:19:36 - 02:21:34:06 Speaker 3 Oh shit. This was a, like, very quick script that I began writing out about, about pyro and the, 02:21:34:10 - 02:21:54:00 Speaker 3 And, what is it? The the the my response. You know, that era when, when he had those accusations come out? Billie Eilish that's a gripping title. Yeah, yeah. No it is it is until proven guilty and all caps. 02:21:54:05 - 02:22:12:00 Speaker 3 Here. Hey. All right. I never did a read of this. I never, never got to recording this throughout the total. His total lifespan on YouTube, Pyrocynical and I as I was like to think, goodness, I can't even read it. Maybe this is why, as I would like to think has had quite a glow up. I ought to be perfectly transparent about my bias. 02:22:12:00 - 02:22:26:44 Speaker 3 It's not to say that none of my points are valid, but I reckon it's important the people know exactly where I'm coming from with this. Take it as you will. Coincidentally, I happen to be the exact same age as the accuser. Me maybe. Hope parentheses. Maybe, say Avery, I have made mistakes that have followed me to this day. 02:22:26:44 - 02:22:53:10 Speaker 3 You mentioned other men doing things. Oh, so this is not. This is not, like, this is literally like the initial vomit draft where it's sort of just like, idea. Okay, move on. Because I just had this idea. Okay. Idea of write this one down. Okay. Let's bit this this idea. Parentheses. This is maybe you think about this thing, you know, just like tons of shit, right? 02:22:53:15 - 02:23:13:36 Speaker 3 You mentioned men doing things to you when you were young. It's not your fault these things happen to you. But if it is true, you knowingly, without withheld your aid from somebody when they asked you if you were real right? With sexual discussions or advances, you have no good right to accuse them of grooming a pedophilia. when it comes to my own personal persuasion as a Pyrocynical fan, if his response doesn't sit well with me, I may very well lose respect for him. 02:23:13:36 - 02:23:37:04 Speaker 3 As others have said. but but I stand by this. Whatever I said on discord about quote, losing respect to comes after proof. in the end, it's not up to me to forgive him. That's between him and the people he's wronged. That's between him and God. Interesting. Yeah. This was just, like, just tons of tons of ideas on the page. 02:23:37:09 - 02:23:42:19 Speaker 3 Very interesting. 02:23:42:24 - 02:24:16:27 Speaker 3 Yeah, yeah. No, that's, that's very interesting. 11 to 20, 20. So that was a year after, the CMU one, I guess was originally I said since November, but this one clearly was in progress since 2019. Normally what comes first is the, is the script. I had a raw script. 83 2019, a line ready script. 02:24:16:32 - 02:24:40:02 Speaker 3 Seven 2339 yeah, this is like a lot older than that. Yeah. And I thought it was a lot older because, like, I definitely do remember there being more things there. Maybe I wasn't talking about that one. I definitely wasn't talking about, the commentary community. One, I was going to make a comprehensive video on the commentary community called, 02:24:40:07 - 02:24:46:51 Speaker 3 Oh, actually, what was it? 02:24:46:55 - 02:25:04:13 Speaker 3 What was what was the a supposed to be? Because I remember it going to be the issues of the coverage, the commentary community. But I had an A in there. Like, what the hell? What was that supposed to be? 02:25:04:18 - 02:25:22:31 Speaker 3 It's just because, like, I was interested in commentary for a while and then, I, I was watching commentary channels and they started pissing me off with how fucking stupid they were. 02:25:25:59 - 02:25:32:39 Speaker 3 Well, this is this is, I dubs this is a. 02:25:32:44 - 02:25:47:18 Speaker 3 Is this is this is a screenshot from an I dubs video. It's called he's still got pyro rule 63 on his desktop. I'm dying. Dot png. 02:25:47:22 - 02:26:23:43 Speaker 3 I'm pretty sure this is, Okay. Sony Vegas Photoshop battlenet. Does that look fucking mirrorless action of bandy cam pyro demo outro 10000 no. This is this is Pyrocynical. because this is his his stream. no, no, that's the output for the video. But yeah, that this image, this was my profile picture on discord for a while. 02:26:23:48 - 02:26:36:19 Speaker 3 I, I saw that it's just like he's still got this fucking they got is this is pyro is not not, I don't know why I thought it was, bloody, I dubs Windows 8. 02:26:38:03 - 02:26:56:32 Speaker 3 Pyro animation. Fuck off. Alert. I need to stop up. Like, exploring all the files. TeamSpeak three. Goodness sake, 2017. That was still viable. It was. But like fucking I was bad. So bad. 02:26:57:31 - 02:27:02:32 Speaker 3 It's funny. 02:27:02:37 - 02:27:36:12 Speaker 3 It was a controversy. He groomed kids will know. Like that was the entire thing. Is that like the the, at worst, he was clumsy, like that. That is just that he did not do his due diligence in ensuring that the people he was talking to was, were of age. Right. And that's certainly not a good thing, but it's so much less bad than what he was actually being accused of. 02:27:36:16 - 02:28:00:09 Speaker 3 It's like he's is not a groomer. If he literally didn't know that they were, but also in in cases where like like he denied it multiple times or something like that. Like if you deny it then it's like, no, like that's just somebody evading. And that's a crime in the same sense. Like, you know, when you've got your responsibility in that sort of a case, that's also evasion. 02:28:00:09 - 02:28:11:01 Speaker 3 It's also bad, clearly, but anyway pyro no fem pyro sweat particles. Goodness. 02:28:22:01 - 02:28:29:23 Speaker 3 How much rule 63 was there or is it a go? 02:28:29:28 - 02:28:52:00 Speaker 3 It's this one. This image was just unspeakably funny to me. There's a reason like a long time pretty chubby to get it deed. 02:28:52:05 - 02:28:57:26 Speaker 3 Ten hours ago. Oh okay. 02:28:57:31 - 02:29:05:14 Speaker 2 No, no. What did you do? You let your dog. No. 02:29:05:19 - 02:29:31:16 Speaker 3 Way. That's insane. Collector's edition as well. I've still got to. One of them I got for free because the. Oh, I don't want to risk that. No no no no no no no no no no no no I need to end the all right. That's what I clicked for because I saw that. Yeah, that's probably not a good idea. 02:29:31:21 - 02:29:57:42 Speaker 3 Not fat enough. Now that's plenty. That's plenty. I'm not setting it. I'm not showing it on straight. That's a bad idea. I just know if there was a button that changes the agenda, most of the presses would be men. yeah. Probably. Which is actually kind of interesting. actually, now, when you think about it, there are plenty of women who would just become rapists, right? 02:29:57:47 - 02:30:18:19 Speaker 3 There's plenty of women who just be like, hell, yeah. I've never spent a single day in my life, with this much testosterone in my body. And it turns out I don't know how to deal with it, because it basically is going to be the same amount of rage that I have on my period, except times ten every single day of my life. 02:30:18:24 - 02:30:28:36 Speaker 3 Mate. What? Yeah. So you didn't you didn't quite get the connect the lines that. 02:30:28:41 - 02:30:32:09 Speaker 3 You know what? You know what women are like when they get on testosterone. 02:30:32:13 - 02:30:34:40 Speaker 2 They're just like, blah blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. 02:30:34:45 - 02:30:57:09 Speaker 3 They're just like, this feels good. They just become evil instantly because they don't know how to handle it. They've got their entire lives at the very just bare minimum amount of testosterone. And then they get bloody testosterone, cause male pattern baldness, and then it's then it's over for them, you know, it's not good. Spider mate. Yes, precisely. 02:30:57:09 - 02:31:13:24 Speaker 3 The symbiote. That's that's what the. That's what testosterone is. It's a symbiote, you know, it helps you out. Is there for you. It helps you stand up for yourself and all that shite. But, it's torture. Unrelenting daughter. Right? You just get so angry all the time, you know? 02:31:13:28 - 02:31:14:42 Speaker 2 Very rarely. 02:31:14:49 - 02:31:27:04 Speaker 3 Anyway. Anyway, I need to leave. I need to be done with stream, because, like, I've gone past the fucking deadline. Deadline? Is there a deadline? I don't know, by it's. Jovan. Thank you for tuning in. It's been a good time. Bad. 02:31:27:04 - 02:31:32:52 Unknown Gotta good time. 02:31:32:57 - 02:31:50:06 Speaker 3 And what does estrogen do? It makes them. Makes them soft and squishy. 02:31:50:11 - 02:32:08:30 Speaker 3 Like the. Generally speaking, that's just what estrogen does. It makes you soft and squishy as a as a human in this sexually dimorphic species. But, if you're a male and you get estrogenic, it gives you cancer. So how do that? 02:32:08:35 - 02:32:12:47 Speaker 3 Let's go with it. Mute button is.